They is a very easy way around not having a set system. Police could simply have an "undercover agent" join the criminal organization and relay incriminating information and evidence of that organization to their superiors in the police. The undercover would have to make sure they do not commit illegal activities while maintaining their cover within the organization. Police would then have a way of building a case against criminal organizations, and adds another sense of realism to criminality and the policing of it. Just my thoughts tho.

It could be very profitable for us and aid in our goals, however transparency among those involved would be key to maintain a strong trust. I have been involved in Commissions, Coalitions, Alliances, etc, in the past that all ended due to people losing trust and tensions over information. I think it would be best to wait, and to privately build this, not in any public setting. Just my thoughts tho. I am open to discussion, please PM me if you wish to talk further.

Your article clearly argues every country listed above is economically growing compared to the US. Also Canada is nothing like California or Sweden, especially in business practices. Again you talk of controlling privatization, but who is going to control it? You have no form of government apparently to oversee and regulate, so there would be no body to control privatization. Again the Federal Reserve ACT may have been a government pushed bill, however it was protecting privatized interests, which had enslaved the American people to an inflated dollar. Also saying every war is started by the government is far from the truth, perhaps in America's history yes, but not for the he EST of the the world. Anarchy would become an established form of government whether you want to admit it or not. atheism as you brought up, the belief of no true religion or God, is still just that. A Belief. All government bodies began with Ideology, and from that birthed the government's we see around us. Yea Hong Kong isn't Communist, it is a Democratic city-state essentially with many outside investors upping the economy in Hong Kong alone. Hong Kong is anything but free lol. The rest of China is also a third world country, so again I don't see who 1 city in a ass backwards country adds anything to an arguement that circles itself. Prove to me where Anarchy has succeeded? Egypt? Anarchy went well there. Lybia? Anarchy (ei the concept of no government or law) causes more death then life, and you can't disprove it, because Anarchy has never successfully worked. Privatization will fail, and your circle of an arguement, and your selective arguing (like with your article you list above about Hong kong) prove nothing to your arguement. ANARCHY CANNOT WORK AS AN IDEOLOGY TO GOVERN PEOPLE'S MORALS AND JUDGEMENT. You system has some many flaws that don't protect the citizens but rather the corporations that will end up becoming the he governing bodies of your ideal. In your system, money makes the decisions, therefore anyone of wealth can manipulate the market to their gain. I ask this time you fully read your own references before you post them, because you Hong Kong argument and your article referenced don't support each other. All the article shows is that Americas laws and regulations (or lack there of) over business are killing it.

I still don't see how pointing out counrty's with high economic freedom support your arguement. China for instance is a Communist government with many regulations, standards, laws, etc governing over business practises within the country. their dollar is also due to lack of debt and the sustainability of their market. Australia, another country listed in your reference, a lot of governing over the business sector. Singapore has tons of government regulation, however their government loves money, so standards are lower. however pricing is higher. Canada is regulated to the max, and taxed for open programs. I could go on forever about how these all counter your own arguement because every major country listed has a large government body maintaining and regulating that standard you are claiming is due to privatization.

The Federal Reserve Act was a government based act yes, however it was an act protecting a privatized banking system which is why now America is adding to their debt in order to maintain the circulation of money. Private Banking means specific sources are the only sources to create and set a dollar value. If they are the only providers of a strong dollar, and you have to pay for their dollar. how would you pay for it? You would have to purchase from them to pay them back, increasing debt. Again the Founding Fathers left a privatized banking system that slaves it citizens. The UK also just broke away from a privatized banking system. You do realise that being a business and being privatized are 2 seperate sections right? it seems this "ideology" with become a government standard. It is know that even Anarchy becomes a form of established government. Therefore this would backfire by trying to "free the people" Also the article you refer to above states the top economic free country's, all of which have large government bodies overseeing and regulating business. Hell Canada is 5th, and I know for a fact there are tons or regulations and oversight to maintain business. However you article focuses on BUSINESS not privatization. Every strong economy knows Privatization kills a strong, and stable economy.

Your economy will fail if privatized. America's economy is in debt due to privatizing their economy through the Federal Reserve Act. Furthermore, the forefathers of America left the colonies of Britain over the privatized banking system. Privatized banking would cause inflation where there isn't a need for it. Money's would compete for the highest dollar, which would cause fluxuation and mass problems. Also if the economy is privatized how will you regulate the dollar and ensure a stable economy?

Your team? Like working for your campaign and what not? I honestly have never thought of a career in politics for identity, could be interesting though

I understand corruption can be found everywhere and greed is something that even our current government bodies can control. I just see a privatization causing further issues with corruption. The entire focus on this society seems to be profit. Profit shouldn't be the main focus of a society, it should sustainability and longevity through being self sufficient and having a stable economy.

I don't see how this could be effective because business would become the government standard and citizens freedoms and liberties will in turn be trampled by greed, corruption, and power. Turning all government services to private business, could be effective for some services to the community (parks, sanitation, roads, etc) however many other services could suffer due to privatization and the removal of a public standard of practice. Policing for example could become easily corruptible due to greed, all because society is focus is "how can I get the most out of everyone". With much privatized, if a monopoly or coup happened to the market, there would be no way to restablize, killing any free market you strive for. Allowing all to carry and defend if given the need will also cause may issues with unnecessary murder and fire fights. An armed society is not a polite society, it is a paranoid society. Murder will be an everyday occurrence and your prison system will be overloaded, which could cause further issues to a market that can easily be destabilized by business. Just seems privatized business practices would become government standard and that is dangerous for a free society.

Boarderlands was a disappointment.

Nice. I was addicted to Final Fantasy 7 on PS. I still am lol. I have it for ps4 now

Saints Row Series was a major contributing factor in THQ's closure. The other major factor was the WWE series. Both were making less than what was being put into development. Agent was announced by Rockstar during July of 2007. To this day, we still have yet to see any screenshot or concept image for it, but it is still listed on Rockstar's games and is scheduled for 2017. It is suppose to be a cold war free roam espionage game.

Watch Dogs: was such a let down, and was over marketed which killed it. Far Cry 4 & Primal: Far Cry 3 unfortunately set a standard for Far Cry that their last 2 installments could not beat. No Man's Sky: Although I love NMS, it is well known Hello Games overhyped this game and board line lied to the consumer, pushing it as a MMO, when it wasn't. E.T: We all know... Mass Effect 3: Another title I love, however many hated the original multiple options for the end of the game. The hatred was so deep, developers released free DLC to add extra endings to the series so people would be happy. Demonic: Many don't know this game, and will never get the opportunity to play it. Originally a big Triple A title for Xbox, and was shown in the movie: Grandma's Boy, Demonic was cancelled before being finished. Silent Hills Aka PT: Del Toro was to be directing the latest installment of the Silent Hill series. However shortly after the launch of the demo, P.T, Del Toro pulled his support for the title and cancelled the game. Saints Row: Argued by many to be fun, comedic games, and Rival to GTA. However the SR series ended up bankrupting THQ causing them to liquify. LA Noire: considered a pioneer in acting and facial detail, LA Noire is considered a cult classic by many, myself included. Sadly this game killed the creator company due to the amount of stress and money it took to make. By the time LA Noire was finished being developed, Santa Monica Studios was filing for bankruptcy and selling their ownership to Rockstar, who was aiding them with funding. Agent: So far the biggest hyped game that has yet to be released. It can be looked at almost like GnR's Chinese Democracy. Rockstar announced Agent almost 10 years ago, and have stated that the game is still in development, with a scheduled release of 2017. However with no more information except what Rockstar is telling us, and the title card, many aren't holding their breath. Metal Gear Survive: Konami's upcoming release under the Metal Gear title. However without Kojima, the creator on board anymore, fans of MGS are expecting a flop, and the trailers have fueled the rage. (Part 1, more will be posted after others get the chance to)

Hockey and MMA. Used to play hockey like mad growing up, as I am from a hockey town. I got into MMA in high school and college, but it wasn't legal where I live for the longest time. Unfortunately when it became legal, I was no longer training because my shoulder kept popping out of place.

PS was my favourite, just because it was the first console I owned. I played Atari when I was young, but I wasn't a big fan. Except Nemco Bowl was amazing. As for if Identity will come to Consoles, maybe. Ports from PC to Console have been a mix of good and bad. Same with Console to PC, good and bad. That is why there are rumours of RDR2 never being ported to PC because of the issues with the original RDR port. If Identity is as great as they plan, they may be hesitant to port it and potential hurt their games reputation. As for the arguements, people need to grow backbones and stop getting offended so easily. The interest is not a "safe space", quit trying to make it one. People also need to clarify when they are role playing, or when they are being idiots and getting personal with insults. Just makes everyone involved look idiotic. Just saying. But yea PS was my jam, and the old Demo Discs were the best. I remember getting demo discs for my PC, only to realise how quickly outdated my PC became. Lol What was everyone's top games on their favourite Console?

Oh look....another mob....

A good criminal will have little to no background history because they are under the radar, how will you verify their history or story? Also if someone is trying to hide from the cops, would a transaction of money for services be the last thing on their mind? Plus I would suspect police can track your spending purchases, and if they produce a warrant for someone's arrest that you are harbouring, you are now a target to for arrest and processing. The concept is interesting, but this advertisement or post I believe will bury you, considering you have now gone completely public. Good luck.

.

Good luck to you and also, weren't you setting up a MC?

Thank you brother. Hopefully we will see each other on the roads and grab a beer

Thank you brother. 1%ers got to watch each other's back, we are the wild cards of society. MCs can take Idenitiy's underground market by storm

Thank you brother. We may have different cuts but we both bleed the same. Watch your back on those roads, brass would love to see the 1% dissappear. Live Free, Ride Hard, Die Young

Did not see that Danny, but thank you.

I am not for this idea. My club and I have been doing this for over a year, we are not going to look for approval from those that consider themselves Big 5 of the area. In fact we will probably try to take the title of the Head of Big 5 of identity. Also I think it was mentioned before, this isn't a title just talked and agreed upon. It is something that needs to be proven in game.

I see we have similar thoughts lol glad to see I am not the only sociopath