slovaceck

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    145

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by slovaceck

  1. Posted

    If you would like to be entered into the Identity Political Organization's June 2018 poll, please comment your Party and Candidate below. The poll will open on the 1st of June and close on the 31st at 11:59PM (GMT+6). Please post as follows;

     

    PARTY NAME - CANDIDATE

     

    Thank you all, and hopefully this can incite some interesting debate.  Remember to join the IPO discord to engage in discussions with the public and the candidates!

     

    https://discord.gg/3KWCQur

  3. Posted · Edited by slovaceck

    10 hours ago, DLimit said:

    As long as one understands the reason for this policy.

    Scenario: "Politician A" hires ten security guards from your company. "Politician B" hires ten security guards from your company. "Political Party A's" politician angrily strikes "Politician B".... your own employees would be assaulting or executing one another since your company is contracted to both parties.

     

    I think you have misunderstood the services we provide. We exist to keep our clients out of trouble. If our client willingly attempts to endanger themselves, it is the responsibility of our personnel to remove them from the situation, not inflame it. Our personnel will not engage other people without threat to their lives or the client's lives. We do not "assault" or "execute" people. We provide security solutions to safeguard the lives of our employees and clients. 

  5. Posted

    15 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

    I’m not a politician, nor do I want to be one.

    We just are on the opposite end of the political spectrum and I took issue with a few things he advocated for.

    After all, who th Governor is will massively impact my experience in the game an I just want to make sure we have the right people in power.

    Ah ok, so then make sure you attend so that you can ask live questions and see which politician shares your views. 

  7. Posted

    15 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

    You do understand that there’s a distinction between the population deciding to buy my product or not, in comparison to the population deciding the DIRECTION of my company, right?

    This is VERY different from one another.

     

    @SupremeLeader @DLimit This sounds like something to be settled in the First IPO Debate! I hope to see you both there. Visit our thread for more info. 

  8. Posted

    Please note that all politicians will be required to speak for themselves or provide a representative to do so during verbal debates. 

    Our Moderators will not speak for any candidate, as they are a 100% neutral party in the debate, and will not present any side. 

    Thank you for understanding!

    All Things Political, IPO

  9. Posted · Edited by slovaceck

    Calling all Political Parties and Politicians!

    The Identity Political Organization is a new merge of some private individuals and The Identity Party Data Service. This new Organization hopes to cover All Things Political in the world of Identity. 

    What we do:

    1. Political Interviews
    2. Debates
    3. Polls
    4. And this is just to start!

    We invite all Individual Politicians and Political Parties to join our Discord server, which can be found at https://discord.gg/3KWCQur 

    The requirements for becoming a registered Politician with us is that you have aForum post, and give a basic outline of what you stand for, nothing more. 

    Members of the Public, non-politicians, are invited to join and ask questions of the Politicians and Parties present on our Discord. 

    We hope to see you all there and to see some interesting political debates and discussions occurring!

    • Like 2

  10. Posted

    29 minutes ago, LuciousTimes said:

    You want them to see your accusations and posters that's fine, let them see it on your feed! I've been trying to run a steady professional campaign since before anyone of these current candidates and I truly dislike things like this! Just promote yourself and leave others alone! If you support your beliefs then speak on them and try to sway others! Don't shame others for thinking different than you, it's a campaign not war! Some of you guys just foul the idea of campaigning to a place it doesn't need to go! I'm just trying to be myself, present my beliefs and get votes from those that agree with me! Is it that hard to get votes that you guys have to attack your competitors? I just don't understand why y'all must be like this?

    This sounds like a disagreement that could be settled in a debate! @LuciousTimes, @MauriceClinton, @BrianHamilton, I hope you all will attend the upcoming debate being run by myself, @Identity_Party_Data, @JoelKeys, and @DrivenMuffin. We hope to see you all debating the most important topics to the people of Identity. More information to come soon. 

  11. Posted

    5 minutes ago, NanoSpace said:

    You know what, I'm not in any mood to stress out about this situation, with my studies in full effect right now I can't be continuing to go back and forth on this, they fixed their problems so I've added them to the poll again.

    Thank you! 

    • Like 1

  12. Posted · Edited by slovaceck

    11 minutes ago, NanoSpace said:

    I think you keep missing my point. I have no problems with them being in the poll or running, I took them down because their original posting consisted of 5 lines and the other parties on the poll were concerned about the poll becoming saturated. I removed them while I figured out what to do and to give them time to fix their problems. The Unified Party has now fixed a lot of problems that I wanted fixed and I said I would add them again since they have a much more thought out idea of what their party is.

    I understand what you are trying to say, but you can't simply remove someone from a poll because their competitors complain about them. A different analogy would be a referee of a sports game ejecting a whole team because their opponents complain that they do not play the "right way". I don't get what justifies the parties being allowed to eliminate a potential candidate. In the real world you can't eliminate a candidate because he isn't serious enough. Imagine they had removed Trump from the ballot because Hillary Clinton said he wasn't a serious politician, it just isn't realistic at all. 

  13. Posted

    7 minutes ago, NanoSpace said:

     I had a couple parties bring up to me their concern about them taking all the seriousness out of the poll and I did my best to fix that issue, once I saw that they were starting to actually show some seriousness I was willing to give them a try, but I would like to put them in an even footing instead of starting late.

    I was not trying to be offensive, apologies if I was. I just don't understand how you can call this a serious poll if you remove a political party because you receive complaints from their competitors. How is that in any way serious? If they decide to run and people start voting for them, you cannot stop them from running or prevent them from winning because their competitors start complaining about them. That would be like the moderators removing all the other Security Firm's posts in the business thread because I complain about them not being as serious as I am about the game. 

    You have a lot of power here, and I appreciate what you are doing with it, I think this will go far. 

  14. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Jax said:

    The other lovely candidates complained about it. So we can't do that. @gabzo

    Bravo to you man for putting up with that, I respect you man. I would have told them where to put it and walked away. Good on  you for sticking to it!

  15. Posted

    1 hour ago, NanoSpace said:

    Since the poll is almost over I will not be adding The Unified Party, but the next poll I will.

    You added them 12 hours ago and the poll still has 4 days left. I don't see how that is "almost over". This polling service so far seems to be as unbiased as the Russian Media when discussing Putin. If anyone is looking for a fair and unbiased representation of the Identity Political Spectrum, this does not seem to be the place to go. 

    • Like 1

  16. Posted

    6 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    HOWEVER, he is still lacking a proper list of policies and laws. He explained a lot of things very well, but he is still missing a list of policies which is a crucial part of a campaign.

    Sorry, but I see a list of policies in his post. 

    Platform Policies

    Our platform polices will be and will remain always to support small government, the lowest possible tax rate, and gun legalization to all PMC's with registration

    It is the right of the citizens to have the means to defend themselves against vagrant criminals. If we take the firearms out of the hands of the citizens we leave them defenseless against the criminal organizations that reign over black market economies. Where we believe in the capabilities of the police force, we also believe that an armed society, is a polite one.

    We will not be concerning ourselves with things of lesser consequence, such as jaywalking, noise complaints, 

     

    You won't see Draconian Laws or penalties under the Unification Party; We believe in Bipartisan policies, that benefit the community as a whole and endorse economic stimulation and growth.  Our policies will always reflect these basic values and understandings, you won't be distracted with flashy websites to disguise corruption or totalitarianism. 

  17. Posted

    5 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    I understand what you're saying but it's not that he wasn't "the most serious", it's that he didn't seem to be serious at all. That is where the issue was. However, as I read earlier, he has since updated his thread and I believe that he is now worthy of being re-added to the poll ( @NanoSpace ). He appears to be making much more of an effort now.

    Thank you for agreeing with me. I did not get the chance to see his previous post. But the point still stands, even a candidate who is not serious at all could still run for governor in game, and we cannot stop them. I would not personally like that, but I can't say "No you're not taking this seriously, you can't run." That person could still run and win if they got the vote. 

  19. Posted

    5 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    Apologies if it seemed as though I had an issue with him running in the candidacy race as that is not the case at all. In fact, I believe that everybody should have the right to run if they feel they are up for it. The issue was that I did not feel as though he was taking it seriously enough by putting no effort into his campaign thread and that is why he was removed from the poll.

     

    The purpose of this poll is not to include all candidates, it's to include all of the most active, serious and hardest working candidates. If we included everyone who ever made a thread about running, the list would be pages long!

    I agree with the most active candidate, because, as you said, we would have a list miles long. But we simply can't deny someone the right to be in a poll because they aren't the most serious or hard working candidate. If he wants to run, he can, and he can win. I mean look at the US President Trump, many people said that he shouldn't be running, and I bet plenty of people wanted to scratch him off the ballot for not being a serious politician, but we just can't. It isn't a just representation of the political climate to cut an active member of the political field off of a poll because other politicians complained about him. Imagine how many elections would be easily won if that was how it really worked. 

  20. Posted

    @BrianHamilton I understand that, but ultimately, if he decides to run, he can. And say he runs and wins in the real game, you can't stop him from doing so. I agree he may not be the most serious and/or professional candidate, but he is a candidate. We simply cannot deny that. So if these polls actually want to represent how a real election in the Identity world may go, they have to include all candidates, no matter how they portray themselves on the forums. 

  21. Posted

    6 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    In other words, you can either vote for a man who, for some reason, pretends to be a magically talking, bipedal lion or you can vote for someone who isn't insane.

    Agreed on that one Mr. Hamilton
     

    This is for the polling agency:

    How come you removed a party from the poll? You biased the poll at that point and it was no longer fair. If you want to show a true poll, you can's adjust it once you put someone in. Ultimately, you cannot stop people from running when the real elections occur, and if there are lots of people voting for a disliked candidate, then they will still win, you can't just scratch them off the ballot and forget about it. 

    I would suggest however, that you maybe narrow the polls down to say a top 5 and have a second round, then you could possibly eliminate any trolls or people who really do not need to be in the poll. That way you could also narrow it down to a top 2 or so. 

  23. Posted

    5 minutes ago, LuciousTimes said:

    Do you consider volunteering something someone is hired to do?

    Sure, I guess. But what I'm trying to say is that you have posted a job advertisement thread in an area for businesses. If you are just looking to get people to work for you, you need to post in the Job Bank, not the area for full businesses. 

  24. Posted

    1 hour ago, LuciousTimes said:

    No, we do employ people! Only volunteership is acceptable, we'd hate to use taxes to pay our workers! In my eyes it's still business!

    Yes, I understand that, but the thread you posted in is for businesses. If you just want to hire people, post in the Job Bank, like Mr. Hamilton did. 

    • Like 1

  25. Posted

    So is the Royal Family Party now a full business? Cause this is posted in an area for businesses, if you're looking for people to work for you and not creating a business, I would suggest posting in the job bank. It is there for people to find employers.