Recommended Posts

 

THE PEOPLE'S REVOLUTIONARY PARTY

(P.R.P.)

avatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7c

grunge_communist_emblem_by_frankoko-d4ie

   avatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7cavatar_64fe2cdb739e_128.png.08c4cba46b7c

 

The ANTHEM of "The People's Revolutionary Party": 

 

 

 

 

(SHALL BE EDITED AND REVISED OVERTIME)


Name: The People's Revolutionary Party (P.R.P.)

Founder/Representative: Damien Malik

Ideology: Direct-Democratic Communism


Explanation of the ideology:

The Direct-Democratic Communist State shall include:

A Communist State involves providing each and every single proletarian (labourer) with free, unlimited, and sustainable food, clothing, shelter, energy, education, and healthcare. In the process, the proletarian-state (worker-owned state) shall seize the means of production within a centralized economy in order to ensure that each and every single human being attains the basic necessities to life. Finally, the idea of "class" shall be abolished in order to prevent the bourgeoisie from exploiting the citizens of the state. 


A Direct-Democracy involves providing citizens with the ability to elect Laws that shall be enacted by the representative of The People's Revolutionary Party, rather than to elect a representative that enacts Laws and policies on behalf of the people. In other terms, in order to prevent the representative from misrepresenting the interests of the proletariat, the representative MUST fulfill the either ACCEPTED or REJECTED proposal by the majority of the citizens within the state or city. Thus, the state is truthfully governed by the PEOPLE based on the sole premise that the PEOPLE elect Laws and policies rather than representatives within office. Hypothetically, if the representative refrains from fulfilling the elected demand of the public, excluding for unconstitutional purposes, the proletarian shall possess every Right to impeach the representative through either peaceful OR violent means. The constitution shall mention that the Law enforcement officers of the state shall be OBLIGATED to overthrow the representative that does not represent the ELECTED decision of the majority, excluding unconstitutional policies, rather than to defend the representatives as it's public servants.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFINITIONS:

Citizen: According to The People's Revolutionary Party, a "Citizen" is identified as an EMPLOYED LABOURER. Any individual that INTENTIONALLY and VOLUNTARILY chooses to remain unemployed, excluding students, physically disabled individuals, and mentally disabled individuals, shall NOT be classified as a citizen of the state. In other terms, a VOLUNTARILY unemployed individual is NOT granted with ANY benefits or Rights by The People's Revolutionary Party considering that the Rights are applied to LABOURERS or WORKING-CLASS CITIZENS.

Constitution of The People's Revolutionary Party:

1. Freedom of Expression: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to express their opinion to the public, excluding hate-speech that may provoke acts of violence within the nation.

2. Right to Food: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to attain a three-course meal during the day.

3. Right to Water: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to sanitary water.

4. Right to Shelter: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to possess a dwelling place with a heating/cooling system, a bed, a fridge, a stove, and a roof over their heads.

5. Right to be Clothed: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to possess clothing in order to survive the cold and/or warm environments.

6. Right to Energy: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to possess energy within their dwelling place, including fuel for their vehicles.

7. Right to Healthcare: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to a doctor, hospital bed, and medication.

8. Right to Education: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to be educated within primary, secondary, and post-secondary educational institutions.

9. Right to Mobility: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to travel throughout the city without any interference, unless the subject infringes the criminal code.

10. Right to Bear Arms: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to possess, own, and travel with a firearm, excluding former felons that have been charged for committing a violent criminal act.

11. Right to Participation: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to participate within Direct-Democratic elections regarding the foreign and domestic political, economic, social, and militaristic policies of the state/city.

 

12. Right to Protect: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to utilize REASONABLE FORCE against any individual that intends to inflict harm against a human being through unconstitutional and unlawful means. 

13. Right to Exist: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to EXIST, despite their gender, sexuality, ethnicity, sexual preference, religious belief, age, nationality, language, physical or mental disability, and political spectrum. This right does NOT include individuals that commit criminal acts.

14. Right to Remain Silent: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to remain silent within any political, legal, social, militaristic, executive, legislative, or economic procedures. In other terms, citizens possess the Right to remain silent, regardless of the situation.

16. Right to Personal Space: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to Personal Space, excluding during circumstances in-which the state possesses probable cause to breach one's personal space for legal, political, or security purposes.

15.. Right to Revolt: Each and every citizen shall possess the Right to utilize REASONABLE FORCE, through peaceful or violent means, in order to overthrow a political leader that commits one of the following offenses: 

---> i. Misrepresentation: An act of "Misrepresentation" involves MISREPRESENTING a CONSTITUTIONAL LAW that is proposed by The People through Direct-Democratic Means. In other terms, an act of "Misrepresentation" involves REJECTING a CONSTITUTIONAL proposition that is presented by The People via a Direct-Democratic Election.

---> ii. Unconstitutionalism: An act of "Unconstitutionalism" involves REPRESENTING an UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW that is proposed by The People through Direct-Democratic Means. In other terms, an act of "Unconstitutionalism" involves ACCEPTING an UNCONSTITUTIONAL proposition that is presented by The People via a Direct-Democratic Election.

---> iii. Counter-Revolutionarism: An act of "Counter-Revolutionarism" involves INTENTIONALLY neglecting an individual's Right to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. An act of "Counter-Revolutionarism" is not applied to citizens that are imprisoned regarding the inability to attain access to education. Additionally, a citizen that VOLUNTARILY remains unemployed, despite being presented with the opportunity of a job, cannot attain benefits from the state (excluding extremely physically and mentally disabled subjects). Thus, an act of "Counter-Revolutionarism" does not apply to INTENTIONALLY unemployed individuals considering that The People's Revolutionary Party merely assists LABOURERS of the state. Furthermore, Law enforcement officers shall be obligated to determine whether the "victim" truthfully lacks the funds to attain food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education during either the "Excess Cycle" or "Classist Period" (Cycles, Periods, and Ages are listed BELOW). In the process, The People are expected to provide evidence confirming that the representative had INTENTIONALLY neglected to provide an individual with access to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. Finally, The People must present evidence confirming that the individual is truthfully neglected the Right to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. If it is not the case, the subject shall be charged for committing the act/offense of "Perjury" (shall be a Criminal Law within the Criminal Code). Otherwise, the representative shall be EXPECTED to provide the individual with the Right to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education within SEVEN DAYS. Failure to provide the victim with Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education shall result in being overthrown by The People.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The People's Revolutionary Court:

The People's Revolutionary Courts shall be divided into three sections:

1. The People's Constitutional Court: "The People's Constitutional Court" involves charging and/or defending individuals, regardless of their authority, for committing unconstitutional offenses. Usually, members of "The People's Revolutionary Party" are charged for committing Unconstitutional acts that may result in a suspension of their membership, termination of their membership, or imprisonment COMBINED with a verbal and written apology to The People via a speech. The procedure involves randomly selecting thirteen jurors via a PUBLIC RAFFLE in order to determine whether the individual is "guilty" or "not guilty" for committing an Unconstitutional offense of either "Misrepresentation", "Unconstitutionalism", or "Counter-Revolutionarism". A lawyer shall be presented to the defendant and prosecutor, combined with a THIRD PARTY Lawyer that critically analyses and questions both parties (defendant and prosecutor) on behalf of The People considering that THE PEOPLE possess every Right to propose questions and critical statements regarding the case. In other terms, the "Third Lawyer" is "The People's Lawyer" that represents the observers of the offense (The offense of "Misrepresentation" and "Unconstitutionalism" shall be observed by each and every citizen within the island).

2. The People's Criminal Court: "The People's Criminal Court" involves charging and/or defending citizens regarding offenses that infringe the criminal code of the state/city/island. The defendant and prosecutor shall be presented with a Lawyer in order to represent their stance within the case. Finally, thirteen jurors shall be randomly selected and summoned to the courts via a PUBLIC RAFFLE.

3. The People's Civil Court: "The People's Civil Court" involves resolving civil disputes such as divorces, contract agreements (different from theft), and numerous other civil matters that are not deemed to be a criminal offense. However, certain civil disputes may be transferred to "The People's Criminal Court" considering that a breach in a contract agreement (could be classified as an act of theft) or an act of spousal abuse may be mentioned within "The People's Civil Court", resulting in resolving a criminal case within the "The People's Criminal Court". Each party shall be presented with a lawyer in order to defend their case. In the process, either a JUDGE that is APPOINTED by "The People's Revolutionary Party" or FIVE JURORS that are randomly selected via a public raffle shall form a conclusion regarding the case. Finally, both parties shall be capable of determining whether the case is resolved by an appointed Judge or a randomly selected group of five jurors. If an agreement cannot be formed, the decision to either appoint a judge or randomly select five jurors shall be formed via a raffle. 

Each and every single court procedure shall consist of a "PEOPLE'S ADVISER", a "P.A." shall be responsible for REVIEWING the information to the jurors in order to ensure that each and every juror is WELL-INFORMED of the Constitutional, Criminal, and Civil Laws that are enacted within the state. The "People's Adviser" is expected to provide jurors with an OBJECTIVE analysis of the entire case in order for the jurors to produce a WELL-INFORMED conclusion during the verdict. 

 

 

The People's Revolutionary Party's "Economic" Cycles + Taxation System

 

"Excess Cycle": The "Excess Cycle" indicates that the state consists of an EXCESS of commodities and services due to OVERPRODUCTION and UNDER-CONSUMPTION. For example, if the state produces an excess of 1000 cans/bags of coffee, each and every single citizen shall possess 100 cans/bags of coffee during that time period. In other terms, an "EXCESS" of goods results in abolishing the "Revolutionary Tax" (100% taxation on every citizen) in order to form a UNIVERSAL TAX that taxes each and every single human being a percentage that is above 5% and beneath 50%.
 

Universal Taxation: Universal Tax in-between 6%-49%

 

"The Classist Period": The "Classist Period" indicates that a major division has been formed within the classes. In other terms, the income-inequality gap has expanded to the extent that the "Classes" have been divided into three main groups: The Proletariat Class, Petty-Bourgeois Class, and Bourgeois Class. Thus, an "Income-Tax" shall be formed based on the FIVE QUNTILE CLASS-BASED SYSTEM:

INCOME TAX:

1. Upper Bourgeois Class (Highest taxation)
2. Upper-Middle Bourgeois Class (Second highest taxation)
3. Middle/Petty-Bourgeois Class (Third highest taxation)

4. Lower-Middle Proletarian Class (Minuscule taxation)

5. Lower Proletarian Class (Minimal taxation)

 

"The Revolutionary Age":  The "Revolutionary Age" indicates that the classes have remain divided, despite the income-tax. In the process, the "Income Taxation" policy does not provide individuals with Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. Thus, The People's Revolutionary Party shall be expected to enact a "Revolutionary Tax" that ensures that each and every single human being attains access to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education within the PLANNED ECONOMY:

Revolutionary Tax:  100% Universal Taxation that is applied to each and every single human being within the state. 

The Revolutionary Tax shall ensure that each and every single human being attains access to Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education.


The cycles/periods circulate in the following order: "The Classist Period", "The Revolutionary Age", and "The Excess Cycle".

Examples of The Order of Cycles/Periods/Ages:

1. "The Classist Period"

2. "The Revolutionary Age" 

3. "The Excess Cycle"

4. "The Classist Period"

5. "The Revolutionary Age" 

6. "The Excess Cycle"

ETC...

 

--------------------------------------------------------------

HIRING! (E-mail me)

Roles WITHIN the organization:

1. Political Members and Representatives

2. Political Advisors (Office Administration)
3. Economic Advisors (Office Administration)
4. Surveyor (Surveys nation... consensus report)
5. Propaganda Expert/Agent (media)
6. Journalists (media)
7. Reporters (media)

8. Distributors (Distribution of goods)
etc... more to come.

Roles OUTSIDE of the organization:

1. Security Guards

 

Application:

Full Name:
Current Occupation:
Former Occupation(s):
Residence/Address:

Reason for joining:

 



<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 

Coalitions:

1. The Anti-Right Coalition:

- The People's Revolutionary Party

- The Radical Democratic-Left Party

============================================================================================

PRODUCE QUESTIONS IN ORDER TO ATTAIN RESPONSES THAT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MAIN POST:


Q&A (QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS):
 

Q: 3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.

A: Each and every citizen deserves the Right to Life, Liberty, and Personal Space. Thus, any act that infringes the Constitution, including lynching the majority without probable cause, is a criminal offense to the party. In the process, lynchings will be prohibited considering that the death penalty is not a necessary or ethical method towards reinforcing positive behaviors and removing negative behaviors within society. 

Q: How much privacy? Do certain people get more privacy than others? What about the right to not be verbally abused? What if the majority classifies a dirty rag as clothing for the minority? I could go on forever. The point is, the majority has too much power.

A: How much privacy? Each and every human being possesses the Right to privacy as long as subjects do not infringe the criminal Laws of the state. In other terms, government agents are expected to attain probable cause or a warrant from a judge, in order to infringe one's Right to privacy. 

The majority cannot enact such Laws against the minority considering that it infringes their Right to Liberty. In fact, one cannot enact any policies that causes one group to be supposedly inferior or superior to another group, excluding certain government-based jobs that involves attaining certain privileges. For example, a Law enforcement officer shall possess the privilege to search and seize a criminal's items during an arrest.

Verbal abuse shall be measured within the judicial system depending on whether the verbal abuse is an act of harassment. An individual possesses the Right to state "F*ck you" as long as it is not a repetitive act that offends an individual or party. However, an individual that possesses a permit to protest within the street possesses every Right to express their ideals within their physical boundaries without being charged for harassment considering that the "victim" could easily depart from the location.

Q: Sounds identical to a welfare state. What will prevent citizens from remaining unemployed due to the amount of benefits and hand-outs that are given by the government?
 

A: Individuals will not attain such benefits from the state unless they are laborers within the state, excluding individuals that are either too physically or mentally disabled to fulfill a single role within the system. Either way, a physically disabled person would possess a job that does not involve physical labour while a mentally disabled individual shall fulfill a role that is functional and desirable for their precious minds. 

Q: The party's policy on "Hate Speech" and "Discrimination" could be abused in order to serve the interests of the state. Would "hating the government" be classified as "Hate-Speech"?
 

A: Any acts of discrimination is intolerable as long as the city/state is governed by The People's Revolutionary Party. However, groups shall be prosecuted if their acts include promoting hate-speech towards another group considering that it may incite violence against a group based on their ideals. For example, a Neo-Nazi cannot express his hatred towards the Negro population considering that it may provoke radical individuals to commit acts of violence against an individual based on the colour of their skin.

In the process, an individual is capable of expressing their opposing ideals against the political party as long as it does not promote violence against a representative that abides by the P.R.P. Constitution. One must understand that it is LEGAL for an individual to state "overthrow the government" if the individual commits an act of "Misrepresentation", excluding the rejection of unconstitutional propositions. However, one cannot incite violence against the party as long as the party remains constitutional with it's actions considering that inciting violence would infringe the party's Right to Life and Liberty.

Disagreement is separate from hate-speech.

Q: How shall the state be funded? What is the taxation plan for the party?

A: Within a planned economy, resources shall be re-allocated according to one's needs. Thus, the SUPPLY of PRODUCED GOODS and SERVICES shall be equally distributed amongst the people. For example, the production of 100,000 bags of coffee beans shall result in providing each and every citizen with 100 bags of coffee (1000 people per server) etc...

It shall depend on the circumstances at the time considering that 100% taxation shall be necessary during an economic crisis that involves government intervention. However, during a time period that involves receiving an excess of goods, the taxation shall be formed solely based on an "income-tax" that is mathematically and scientifically measured by our economists.

Funding? The people shall produce commodities and services that shall be distributed to the public. Simple as it sounds, it is effective when each and every human being fulfills the role that they desire within society.

In other terms, the "100% Tax" shall be revoked as long as each and every single human being attains free food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education combined with other luxuries that are equally distributed by the party. However, the "100% tax" shall be re-enacted if the income-inequality gap increases to the extent that it forms a division between classes.

Q:  Will all citizens earn a equal amount for each job, or will you be payed more for the more intensive labor (Mentally&physically). For example a truck driver compared to a construction worker. Or will you drop that aspect of communism and allow people to still earn more then the person next to him/her. And if so how high will taxation be?

 

A: In reality, it often depends on the circumstances.

The objective of the party involves ensuring that the citizens fulfill roles that they desire for non-materialistic purposes. Thus, an individual should function as a doctor for the sole purpose of functioning as a doctor rather than functioning as a doctor in order to accumulate an extensive amount of wealth. Thus, the party would expect individuals to be paid the identical wage in order to ensure that one's labour is "internalized" rather than "externalized".

http://aluceromontano.tripod.com/id11.html

However, as long as each and every human being is capable of attaining Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education, wages could be divided according to one's internalized labour. Thus, a doctor may earn more than a garbage man/woman as long as each and every human being attains Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education.

During periods of overproduction, taxation shall be decreased to a simple "income-tax" that involves increasing taxation to individuals with a higher income and decreasing taxation to individuals with a lower-income based on a "five-quintile" class structure.

1. Upper Class
2. Upper-Middle Class
3. Middle Class
4. Lower-Middle Class
5. Lower Class

Overproduction results in enacting an "INCOME-TAX" considering that each and every human being shall attain an EXCESS of Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. For example, the production of 100,000 cans/bags of coffee shall provide each citizen with 100 cans/bags of coffee, indicating that a commodity is in EXCESS to the public.

However, during a time period of underproduction and underconsumption, the "Income-Tax" shall be abolished in exchange for a "100% Universal Tax" in order for the party to distribute resources a bit more effectively, according to the NEEDS of the people. 

Q:  Your view on marriage? Gay marriage? Beastiality?

A:  Marriage shall remain identical to the current system, excluding the establishment of the idea of "ownership". Thus, the items that are shared between both individuals or partners within a "legal bond" does not consist of "private property" considering that "private property" shall be replaced with "personal items". It merely involves the elimination of the capitalist idea of "ownership".

Homosexuality, alongside forming homosexual relationships and legal bonds, shall be a legal and acceptable act that is supported by The People's Revolutionary Party considering that it is one's Right to Life and Liberty.

It shall be illegal for human beings to engage in sexual relations or a legal bond with an animal considering that the animal is incapable of voluntarily consenting to such agreements via a verbal or written contract. 

It shall be illegal for adults to engage in sexual relations or a legal bond with children considering that a child's mind is not well-developed to form to voluntary decision to engage in either sexual relations or a legal bond with an adult through a verbal or written contract. However, it shall be legal for a sixteen year-old to consent to sexual relations with another individual that is in-between the ages of sixteen and seventeen. 

Q: It is impossible for a democracy to be present within Communism. In reality, it is only effective within Capitalist systems. What is your opinion on such a claim?

A:  Communism and Democracy are 100% synonymous with one another considering that Communist serves the interests of the whole while a democracy serves the interests of a majority under Constitutional guidelines. In reality, Democracies are antonymous to capitalism based on the sole premise that a capitalistic system serves the interest of an INDIVIDUAL'S PRIVATE INTERESTS while a democracy serves the interests of a MAJORITY'S NATIONAL INTEREST. Usually, the INDIVIDUAL'S PRIVATE INTEREST involves wealthy bourgeois multi-millionaires and billionaires countering against the political proposals of working-class citizens considering that the MAJORITY of citizens within any given nation is within the lower three quintiles of the financial class-based system. Thus, politicians within advanced capitalist Neo-Liberal democracies often serve the interests of the top two dominant quintiles despite possessing a majority population of the top three lowest quintiles. In other terms, the Neo-Liberal advanced capitalist bourgeois-state serves the interests of the wealthy via capitalism while neglecting the democratic decisions of the public considering that elected officials do not fulfill their promises in public in order to serve the interests of the bourgeoisie/wealthy land owners. In conclusion, capitalism is NOT synonymous with democratic ideals while COMMUNISM is 100% synonymous with Direct-Democratic ideals.

Q: How shall the P.R.P. provide 300-1000 citizens with free housing?

A: The taxation system shall ensure that each and every single human being is capable of residing within a two-bedroom apartment, regardless as to whether the state is in the "Income Tax" stage or "Universal/Revolutionary Tax" stage.

Q: How shall a "Direct-Democracy" be formed within the state?

A:  The people propose ideals and and vote on the proposition in order for The People's Revolutionary Party to review whether the proposition is "CONSTITUTIONAL" or "UNCONSTITUTIONAL". If the Law or policy is Unconstitutional, it shall be REJECTED by the representative of the party. If the Law is Constitutional, it shall be accepted by the representative of the party. If the representative ACCEPTS an Unconstitutional policy, the representative shall be overthrown by a COMBINATION of the PARTY, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, AND PEOPLE for enacting an Unconstitutional Law and committing an act of "Unconstitutionalism". If the representative REJECTS a Constitutional policy, the representative shall be overthrown by a COMBINATION of the PARTY, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, AND PEOPLE for committing the offense of "Misrepresentation".

Edited by DLimit
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

The logo looks pretty nice.

 

Keep up the good work!

Does one possess any questions regarding the political, economic, social, or legal affairs of the P.R.P.?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, DLimit said:

Does one possess any questions regarding the political, economic, social, or legal affairs of the P.R.P.?

I just have personal objections to the philosophy behind communism that's honestly not going to change from a conversation on the forums.

Also, I haven't seen one real world example where a communist state did NOT turn completely totalitarian with massive suffering of the people. When the whole idea of communism is behind rejecting the sovereignty of the individual (Marx), what stops the communist state from inflicting any amount of oppression and violence on the people in the name of the collective good?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

I just have personal objections to the philosophy behind communism that's honestly not going to change from a conversation on the forums.

Also, I haven't seen one real world example where a communist state did NOT turn completely totalitarian with massive suffering of the people. When the whole idea of communism is behind rejecting the sovereignty of the individual (Marx), what stops the communist state from inflicting any amount of oppression and violence on the people in the name of the collective good?

The state shall function as a Direct-Democracy. Thus, the representative possesses zero powers excluding the ability to fulfill the demands of the public through the democratic process. Otherwise, the state, alongside it's citizens, shall possess the Right to overthrow the representative through peaceful or forceful means if the representatives commits an act that violates the constitution.

Private Property has been responsible for exploiting the labour power of working class citizens while neglecting individuals the ability to attain food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education, such as the case-study that involves Nestle OWNING the fresh-water rivers of India, resulting in average farmer's inability to harvest crops.

Sacrifice the individual in order to benefit the WHOLE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, DLimit said:

The state shall function as a Direct-Democracy. Thus, the representative possesses zero powers excluding the ability to fulfill the demands of the public through the democratic process. Otherwise, the state, alongside it's citizens, shall possess the Right to overthrow the representative through peaceful or forceful means if the representatives commits an act that violates the constitution.

Private Property has been responsible for exploiting the labour power of working class citizens while neglecting individuals the ability to attain food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education, such as the case-study that involves Nestle OWNING the fresh-water rivers of India, resulting in average farmer's inability to harvest crops.

Sacrifice the individual in order to benefit the WHOLE.

 

Under a communist state, will it really be a direct democracy? We can look at examples in history, and it's no coincidence that even the present-day standing communist countries have extreme restrictions and regulations in place to ENSURE the victory of the communist party. Whether they use brutal force, fear, mass production of propaganda, or even just openly ban specific political parties all together (China, NK, Cuba) it's never going to be a "Direct-Democracy". Every standing communist party has total political monopoly for a reason: If they don't, they'll 100% get voted out by the PEOPLE. These people have starved, lived through 50 feet of shit below poverty, and have even been murdered by their communist leaders; all of this in the name of the "collective good".

I have no more faith in your proposed administration working under this veil of "democracy" in the communist system than I do with the leaders of China, or North Korea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

 

Under a communist state, will it really be a direct democracy? We can look at examples in history, and it's no coincidence that even the present-day standing communist countries have extreme restrictions and regulations in place to ENSURE the victory of the communist party. Whether they use brutal force, fear, mass production of propaganda, or even just openly ban specific political parties all together (China, NK, Cuba) it's never going to be a "Direct-Democracy". Every standing communist party has total political monopoly for a reason: If they don't, they'll 100% get voted out by the PEOPLE. These people have starved, lived through 50 feet of shit below poverty, and have even been murdered by their communist leaders; all of this in the name of the "collective good".

I have no more faith in your proposed administration working under this veil of "democracy" in the communist system than I do with the leaders of China, or North Korea.

Neither The Republic of China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, or the U.S.S.R. were Communist nations considering that such nations were State-Capitalist Degenerated Worker States.

A TRUE Communist state is automatically a Direct-Democratic state considering that it functions as a "Dictatorship (ruled) of the Proletariat (workers)". How would The People's Revolutionary Party possess the ability to abolish a Direct-Democratic procedure without infringing the Constitutional Laws that results in the IMPEACHMENT through PEACEFUL or VIOLENT means?

The party legitimately states that it's citizens, including Law enforcement officers, could possess the LEGAL RIGHT to execute it's representative as long as the representative infringes the Constitutional guidelines of The People's Revolutionary Party. In reality, the Representative IS the people considering that the Representative does NOT possess the authority to enact any Laws or Policies without the CONSENT and WILL of the PEOPLE through a DIRECT-DEMOCRATIC VOTE.

In other terms, the representative is the puppet of it's people... the voice of it's people... the representative of it's people.... it cannot infringe the Constitution without being assassinated by one individual.

Edited by DLimit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DLimit said:

Neither The Republic of China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, or the U.S.S.R. were Communist nations considering that such nations were State-Capitalist Degenerated Worker States.

A TRUE Communist state is automatically a Direct-Democratic state considering that it functions as a "Dictatorship (ruled) of the Proletariat (workers)". How would The People's Revolutionary Party possess the ability to abolish a Direct-Democratic procedure without infringing the Constitutional Laws that results in the IMPEACHMENT through PEACEFUL or VIOLENT means?

The party legitimately states that it's citizens, including Law enforcement officers, could possess the LEGAL RIGHT to execute it's representative as long as the representative infringes the Constitutional guidelines of The People's Revolutionary Party. In reality, the Representative IS the people considering that the Representative does NOT possess the authority to enact any Laws or Policies without the CONSENT and WILL of the PEOPLE through a DIRECT-DEMOCRATIC VOTE.

In other terms, the representative is the puppet of it's people... the voice of it's people... the representative of it's people.... it cannot infringe the Constitution without being assassinated by one individual.

I don't think there's any amount of times we can try the whole communism thing until we get it "right". 

We don't live in a Utopian society, and if what you're trying to accomplish is bringing the power from the government back to the people, then you sure as hell don't do that by giving more power to the government. This seems all totally contradictory to me, that you state in one post that "the government is just a puppet of the people", then at the same time you give the government body the power to control completely the direction of the state economy through seizing the means of production, and destroying the free market.

You have to understand that this system BREEDS corruption. It gives too much trust in the leaders of the communist party at that given point to make all the decisions in the favor of the people, and not some other conflicting interest.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SupremeLeader said:

I don't think there's any amount of times we can try the whole communism thing until we get it "right". 

We don't live in a Utopian society, and if what you're trying to accomplish is bringing the power from the government back to the people, then you sure as hell don't do that by giving more power to the government. This seems all totally contradictory to me, that you state in one post that "the government is just a puppet of the people", then at the same time you give the government body the power to control completely the direction of the state economy through seizing the means of production, and destroying the free market.

You have to understand that this system BREEDS corruption. It gives too much trust in the leaders of the communist party at that given point to make all the decisions in the favor of the people, and not some other conflicting interest.

You seem to possess a major misunderstanding of Communism.

1. The state is GOVERNED by the PROLETARIAT considering that the PROLETARIAT SEIZES THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION
2. The REPRESENTATIVE must abide by the proletariat. Otherwise, the representative shall be overthrown.
 

What seems challenging for one to understand?

 

The STATE IS THE PEOPLE. The GOVERNMENT IS THE PEOPLE. THAT is Communism... 

It prevents wealthy corporations from exploiting the people considering that the people control the market through a Direct-Democratic Communist state.

Stalinism is not Communism considering that it is Stalinism, an ideology that resulted in the formation of a CAPITALIST Degenerated Workers State.

P.S. Capitalism has caused more deaths than every so-called "Communist" nation combined.

Edited by DLimit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Mr. @DLimit,
Thank you for taking this time to sit down and talk with me.
You don't know me yet, I am Special Agent Zoey Anderson.

I'm here on official FBI business, I'm afraid. Not here to talk politics.
Your views are of no concern to me.

However, what is a concern to me, is the allegations that ties you to an
organization that calls themselves The "Left Hand Mafia". Apparently,
putting you as their leader.

How do you respond to these allegations?"

 

(( I do wish you the best of luck on your campaign, I'm just here in-character. And no offense is meant.
You don't have respond in-character if you don't wish to partake in the RP. :P ))

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The main aspects of the game a governor will handle are taxes, prison sentences and drug legalization...may we hear about any of those?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/23/2017 at 8:53 AM, Norway174 said:

"Mr. @DLimit,
Thank you for taking this time to sit down and talk with me.
You don't know me yet, I am Special Agent Zoey Anderson.

I'm here on official FBI business, I'm afraid. Not here to talk politics.
Your views are of no concern to me.

However, what is a concern to me, is the allegations that ties you to an
organization that calls themselves The "Left Hand Mafia". Apparently,
putting you as their leader.

How do you respond to these allegations?"

 

(( I do wish you the best of luck on your campaign, I'm just here in-character. And no offense is meant.
You don't have respond in-character if you don't wish to partake in the RP. :P ))

The allegations that are produced by Special Agent Zoey Anderson are one-hundred percent false without any evidence to support such a claim. In the process, I am not familiar with such an organization.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.

 

Not to mention the economy will collapse as no one will want to work, as money is useless.

Edited by uncannierlink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that is four words sorry OCD but I would like to say to this party that these are basic rights of citizens what is your tax plan and are you running fro governor 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2017 at 8:06 PM, uncannierlink said:

3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.

 

Not to mention the economy will collapse as no one will want to work, as money is useless.

Each and every citizen deserves the Right to Life, Liberty, and Personal Space. Thus, any act that infringes the Constitution, including lynching the majority without probable cause, is a criminal offense to the party. In the process, lynchings will be prohibited considering that the death penalty is not a necessary or ethical method towards reinforcing positive behaviors and removing negative behaviors within society. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2017 at 9:57 PM, ThomasHetch said:

that is four words sorry OCD but I would like to say to this party that these are basic rights of citizens what is your tax plan and are you running fro governor 

Within a planned economy, resources shall be re-allocated according to one's needs.

It shall depend on the circumstances at the time considering that 100% taxation shall be necessary during an economic crisis that involves government intervention.

Funding? The people shall produce commodities and services that shall be distributed to the public. Simple as it sounds, it is effective when each and every human being fulfills the role that they desire within society.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/6/2017 at 8:06 PM, uncannierlink said:

3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.

 

Not to mention the economy will collapse as no one will want to work, as money is useless.

P.S. Individuals will not attain such benefits from the state unless they are laborers within the state, excluding individuals that are either too physically or mentally disabled to fulfill a single role within the system. Either way, a physically disabled person would possess a job that does not involve physical labour while a mentally disabled individual shall fulfill a role that is functional and desirable for their precious minds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, DLimit said:

Each and every citizen deserves the Right to Life, Liberty, and Personal Space. Thus, any act that infringes the Constitution, including lynching the majority without probable cause, is a criminal offense to the party. In the process, lynchings will be prohibited considering that the death penalty is not a necessary or ethical method towards reinforcing positive behaviors and removing negative behaviors within society. 

 

Yes, but who defines what Life Liberty and Personal Space means? The majority. While maybe they couldn't kill them, they could certainly disenfranchise them in other areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, uncannierlink said:

Yes, but who defines what Life Liberty and Personal Space means? The majority. While maybe they couldn't kill them, they could certainly disenfranchise them in other areas.

Any acts of discrimination is intolerable as long as the city/state is governed by The People's Revolutionary Party. However, groups shall be prosecuted if their acts include promoting hate-speech towards another group considering that it may incite violence against a group based on their ideals. For example, a Neo-Nazi cannot express his hatred towards the Negro population considering that it may provoke radical individuals to commit acts of violence against an individual based on the colour of their skin.

Disagreement is separate from hate-speech.

Unconstitutional.

P.S. The majority cannot infringe the Constitutional guidelines of the party.

Simplified:

"Life" = Right to exist
"Liberty" = Right to BE
"Personal Space" = Right to privacy, household, food, clothing, shelter, energy, and other possessions that are not PRIVATELY owned, but PERSONALLY owned by the individual.

Edited by DLimit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, DLimit said:

Any acts of discrimination is intolerable as long as the city/state is governed by The People's Revolutionary Party. However, groups shall be prosecuted if their acts include promoting hate-speech towards another group considering that it may incite violence against a group based on their ideals. For example, a Neo-Nazi cannot express his hatred towards the Negro population considering that it may provoke radical individuals to commit acts of violence against an individual based on the colour of their skin.

Disagreement is separate from hate-speech.

Unconstitutional.

P.S. The majority cannot infringe the Constitutional guidelines of the party.

Simplified:

"Life" = Right to exist
"Liberty" = Right to BE
"Personal Space" = Right to privacy, household, food, clothing, shelter, energy, and other possessions that are not PRIVATELY owned, but PERSONALLY owned by the individual.

 
 

How much privacy? Do certain people get more privacy than others? What about the right to not be verbally abused? What if the majority classifies a dirty rag as clothing for the minority? I could go on forever. The point is, the majority has too much power.

 

Also, if the people who enforce the laws answer to the majority than what difference does it make if the constitution says one thing or another. When you give all the power to the majority, there is nothing to balance them out.

Edited by uncannierlink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, uncannierlink said:

How much privacy? Do certain people get more privacy than others? What about the right to not be verbally abused? What if the majority classifies a dirty rag as clothing for the minority? I could go on forever. The point is, the majority has too much power.

 

Also, if the people who enforce the laws answer to the majority than what difference does it make if the constitution says one thing or another. When you give all the power to the majority, there is nothing to balance them out.

How much privacy? Each and every human being possesses the Right to privacy as long as subjects do not infringe the criminal Laws of the state. In other terms, government agents are expected to attain probable cause or a warrant from a judge, in order to infringe one's Right to privacy. 

The majority cannot enact such Laws against the minority considering that it infringes their Right to Liberty. In fact, one cannot enact any policies that causes one group to be supposedly inferior or superior to another group, excluding certain government-based jobs that involves attaining certain privileges. For example, a Law enforcement officer shall possess the privilege to search and seize a criminal's items during an arrest.

Verbal abuse shall be measured within the judicial system depending on whether the verbal abuse is an act of harassment. An individual possesses the Right to state "F*ck you" as long as it is not a repetitive act that offends an individual or party. However, an individual that possesses a permit to protest within the street possesses every Right to express their ideals within their physical boundaries without being charged for harassment considering that the "victim" could easily depart from the location.

You are listing unconstitutional scenarios. The Constitution mentions that the representative could reject any proposition by the People as long as the proposition is unconstitutional.

Edited by DLimit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harassment is a form of discrimination. It involves any unwanted physical or verbal behaviour that offends or humiliates you. Generally, harassment is a behaviour that persists over time. Serious one-time incidents can also sometimes be considered harassment.

Harassment occurs when someone:

  • makes unwelcome remarks or jokes about your race, religion, sex, age, disability or any other of the 11 grounds of discrimination
  • threatens or intimidates you. 
  • makes unwelcome physical contact with you, such as touching, patting, pinching or punching, which can also be considered assault.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now