Okay, so in what way does my argument contradict Webster´s definition of an argument? Does Webster state that an argument is based on emotional outbursts, opinions and non-facts?

Good.

I couldn't care less what your progressive party thinks on how we should handle our business, though I understand your concern since you're a statist afterall. We don't believe in democracy since the majority rules the minority, we want a society without rulers and governments so democracy will not be part of our society, it'll be total freedom for all. Anarchism. "I would inquire where your party is likely to be based".... Not an argument. "I am also questioning you beliefs and political message as if you were to get into power this would create total chaos which would threaten the lives of the very citizens you are supposed to be operating in their favour."...What is this power you speak of? To bear arms? To not have a government that tells me what to do? Yeah that's what I'm fighting for, I fight for freedom and the peoples liberation from statists like yourself. "this is not a political party but an anti-social threat to the stability most governments enjoy"... Correct! and we are proud of that. Statist like yourself who want the government power and its monopoly on force to initiate violence so that you can regulate the people and tax their hard earned money, you'll be the first who we'll point our fingers at and if you try to shut us down using force, we will kill you and all your party members in self-defense. We are rebels and we'll make sure that the whole world knows that when tyranny tries to rule the people, that we'll arm the whole society with firearms so that they can protect themselves from tyranny and with voluntary premission join our glory to crush the state power, we don't serve the state, it is you that serve the people and our job is to make sure of that. "your inclusion of a military aspect is a dangerous comparison between you and the NSDAP and their S.A"... Comparing us to statists is not very accurate. My army is a freemarket invention and has no monopoly on force. Stop with the non-sense.

Make an argument then. Because frankly this is not an argument.

Non Aggression Principle, break this one and you´ll get shot. That´s the only rule you have to follow in a anarcho-capitalist society. Everything else is done through ostracism and contract agreements etc.

Nixon was a statist.

Yeah sorry for having standards and low tolerance for non-sense, either you make an argument or go to the Communist party where you can talk about your feels. This is not the place for it.

Non-factual statements and opinions, emotional outbursts etc. Are not arguments.

Where is Liberty Prime when you need him?

We are currently also looking to trade with other businesses that will help us manifacture goods. Here is a list of businesses that we´re currently looking for to work with. If you're intrested working with us then tell us what you have to offer and why we should pick you over other businesses. Tailor Business: We need a lots of all-black clothing made of high quality 100% cotton that we´ll be wearing under our military gear. Other types like silk and wool might be included in the future. Automobile Business: We´re looking for a automobile business that can produce black bulletproof SUVs for our Corporation. Private Healthcare Company: Somebody that can fix up ballistic wounds and other forms of physical trauma for our troops in no time and sell us large amounts of medkits for a reasonble price, we´re willing to hire your doctors during contract missions.

You don't need to Clinton on me. You still haven't dissaproved my sources and you haven´t apologized for calling me an insane 9/11 sandy hook denier troll with a clear mental disorder, until then I´m not going argue with anything you have to say.

Wait so you´re not going to apologize for that? Because your justification for this hot mess of emotionally empty driven outbursts of yours is pretty much bullshit, there is plenty of information out there that are credible if you want to find it, so instead of wasting my and others time with your tantrums and emotions that I genuinely couldn't give a single fuck about, could you go dig out some facts and make an argument instead spewing bunch of non-sense? Because if not I´m just going to ignore you and move on, you're not needed here.

So instead of dissaproving my sources you call me an insane 9/11 sandy hook denier, nutty person and or a troll with clear mental disorder, right. Not an argument.

Calling me a crazy 9/11 sandy hook denier, is not an argument. Go away or make an argument.

Well lets hope you never get cancer then, lol.

Not an argument

http://civitasreview.com/halthcare/father-of-canadian-health-care-admits-its-a-failure/ http://www.city-journal.org/html/ugly-truth-about-canadian-health-care-13032.html http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/10/09/donald-trump-canada_n_12423178.html I don't want to get sick in Canada.

Public sector healthcare is a disaster, by the way how is that Obamacare going for you guys in America?

Brothers and sisters! I want to announce that I have started a new company called Blackwood Corporation, check it out!

There will be diffrent currencies that banks will print and the most stable currency will be the most valuable one, gold for example is a currency not printed or run by the government and yes obviously you can't print gold, bitcoins is another example. What the government can do the freemarket can do better, the freemarket can bring order to a society.

You mean intellectual space? Correct, emotional reactiveness and tantrums are not welcome here. Only arguments, you can be passive-aggressive all you want but you're not going to be taken seriously, we don't give fuck about your feelings here. Don't like it, then leave or make an argument.

That's the point, Anarchy means no rulers or governments. Asking for funds is not taxation since there is voluntarism between the actors, it's called charity to voluntary fund something which I support as substence to taxation, if you want to build factories, houses or roads in anarcho-capitalist society and you don't have the resources for it, you can always get a loan from banks or get inverstors to support you, I don't see why government is needed here to make this possible.

I never said "give guns" to people, my argument is that the state should not regulate gun laws, I recommend everyone to arm themselves because only you can save your life in the moments of danger and rise of tyranny. Look I'm not saying there won't be crime in a anarchist society, but there will be far less crime when everybody can protect themselves from criminals and hire private security etc. The question here is how much are you willing to pay for security, in our society you get to choose the price and the type of security you're willing to pay for or none at all, while in a statist society you have to pay money through taxes against your will for a government police to do that job, and they do a much worse job on stopping criminals and killers than private police.

Go on, why do we need laws and taxes for my community to be satisfied? What does that even mean?