FatherOfTimes

Members
  • Content count

    101
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by FatherOfTimes


  1. I think he should have titled along the lines of his withdrawal rather than Vote Lucious Times. The title he chose, in my opinion was more to show he was now supporting Lucious. I think that his topic was more to let us know he wanted the community to support Lucious rather than let us know he was dropping out of the race...and that's why I think he gave it that particular title. If everyone did it, I feel it'd be pointless. However, if his intention was to make people focus more on Lucious rather than on his dropping out of the race than I think he chose the right title...this time!


  2. 54 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    I feel that there's far more than simply @LuciousTimes and myself, even though I am aware that you said "two main politicians", as I would say all those who participated in the IPO Debate of November could be classed as "main" politicians as they, along with Lucious and myself (both of whom also attended the debate), appear to be the most recent and up-to-date candidates.

     

    Unfortunately, due to work in real life, I haven't been able to check Identity a lot recently but I believe that all those who attended the debate last month are still running nowadays.

    In regards to vote size, Jack Lester should definitely be classed as a main candidate as he gained a very significant amount of votes, almost drawing second with myself.

     

    Either way, I wish all candidates the absolute best in the election :)

     

    My website can be found here if anybody is interested in learning more about my party.

    Yes, I agree.


  3. 31 minutes ago, SupremeLeader said:

    I have no reason to vote for you if you have the capability to completely change your platform on a weekly basis. This means nothing more than that you don't hold any strong positions and that you're easily convinced via popular opinion. You have to understand that popular opinion isn't always the right one!

    Honestly, I don't see you having the characteristics of somebody we need in a position of political power. I've seen it first hand where you cower behind "negotiation" the moment you begin to lose an argument, rather than actually showing some confidence in your beliefs.

    Even though I personally agree with the positions in your changed campaign more than before, I would have honestly considered you more as a viable candidate if you at least just remained consistent. You kept absolutely nothing from your beginning campaign, and completely abandoned your grassroots supporters. To me, this shows extreme weakness and spinelessness in your ability to hold your own.

    You prefer a candidate that is set in stone on his platform to present a confident character rather than a candidate that changes his platform under the claim that he does it to continuously better his campaign... you seem foolish to leadership. One must continuously learn and change.


  4. 6 minutes ago, LuciousTimes said:

    OFFCIAL NOTICE OF LUCIOUS TIMES:

    I, Lucious Times, am officially free from my sentence and ready to tackle my new visions! 

    ( Due to exemplary behavior my sentenced time has lessened [good behavior])

     

    To @Norway174 , thank you! You gave me reasoning and helped me pave way for a better campaign and helped build a better man to help lead the people of Identity Island.

     

    To @JoelKeys , I'm back good friend. Please be inclined to look over my new policies so that we may continue our work. Happy to be working with such a great candidate.

     

    To @Kaitlyn , I've missed our conversations. It was painful not being able to speak with you, I hope to hear from you soon in hopes of pursuing our conversation further.

     

    To @FatherOfTimes , I appreciate you being there for me even when you aren't always sure of what's going on. You really are like a father to me!

     

    To @Rumpelstiltskin , I admit we came to know each other at a bumpy time but I still am proud to have had your support. My gratitude be given!

     

    To All Supporters, I appreciate you all being there for me! I wouldn't make it without you all. It truly gives me reason to keep improving! As you may have noticed I drastically improved the policies to fit that of the people's benefit versus the government's benefit. I had things confused, I felt that because crime was so evident that the government needed to be strong in order to challenge that crime, but with my new policies the economy itself will aid in crime deterrence. Plus, our FBI and local law enforcement  are quite superb. Lucious Times is back and better!!! It's time to shine like The Royal Family we are.

     

    While incarcerated, I experienced many characters of people. However, oddly I had respect from the inmates due to my decision to turn myself in. They felt only truly respectable would do such. There were harsh and calm moment on the inside, but I surpassed them all. I and the law are in pursuit of other criminals and plan to truly clean the island of criminology. Please intrigue yourself with images of my incarceration:

    591d1a2cd32f5_norway1.jpg.8d7fa0673024cb591d1a351b20c_norway2.thumb.png.81f52e04

    THE GREATEST...NO MORE NEEDED SAID!


  5. 6 minutes ago, Perlman said:

    I'm not contesting his reasoning behind his actions, or even accusing Lucious of malicious intent.
    However, transparency must be maintained without exceptions.
    What he's doing is fantastic, I'm all for people owning up to their past transgressions.
    We'll have to see where he goes from here.

    Exemplary response! 


  6. 6 minutes ago, Perlman said:

    Actions speak louder than words, and nine times out of ten the people are coerced into electing a crow eater into office who cares more whatever image he's attempting to project than the well-being of his people.

    Lucious committed crime for the well-being of the people, is that not action? No debate or war to be started I'm just curious of your opinion! My son is a good man, as I presume you to be! We're all aware that any candidate could give false truth.


  7. To be utterly clear, it is obvious I support my son! However, it is the Times Family duty to express choice amongst the people and that is what we show, choice! Buy in choosing your choice consider the following:

    Activity

    Party Platform

    And Transperency!


  8. 12 minutes ago, Norway174 said:

    Again you assume. I didn't say I was suspicious of you. I said I was curious as to why you chose to respond the way you did.

    You don't have to tell me. You're not under any obligation to tell me. You're free to respond however you like. I was simply wondering.

    What is it you wish to know...the family has no secrets.