Xilvius

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    83

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Xilvius

  2. Posted

    7 minutes ago, OreoIsLekker said:

    Also... you know that 8 = eight and not 'ate'? Because the title says: ''Seckshun 8", but you say "Seckshun ate."

    "Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken" -Tyler durdon

  3. Posted

    6 minutes ago, Micky_Tohmpson said:

    So basically you just kill people, nothing new. 

    You only kill people when things dont go right. It's a last resort. I jut want to make sure someone is willing to do it if required.

  6. Posted

    Seckshun ate is looking for those interested in joining a tight knit group of like minded individuals. We require our members to be capable of murder without question. No need to reply here, we can discuss employment in a pm or privately on discord. We accept all types within our ranks, be it members of other syndicates, police, business owners, ect. Your membership in seckshun ate will be known only to me. 

    Seckshun ate-   We're coming for you.

  9. Posted

    1 hour ago, The1TheOnlyGonzo said:

    This seems very interesting. 

    How would you deal with a failing business? Would there be a liquidation process or a bailout system in play for the market? 

    We believe in free markets. Meaning there is no limit to your success or failure. If your business goes under, it goes under. If you are participating in our program we will do our best to advertise your business to the masses, but ultimately your success or failure is entirely in your own hands.

    • ver.1.22474487139 1

  10. Posted

    1 hour ago, ColeBarron said:

    That is understandable, and again, thank you for the response. On another topic, could you tell me how you feel about politicians that switch their views on their own policies mid-campaign? Do you feel it is right for a politician to switch their stance on a topic due to getting negative feedback from the community?

    Personally, politicians are people to. People sometimes change their mind, it happens. As forerunner for Unified, i made sure that i agreed with my policies before stating them. Maybe pther politicians havent fogured out the best platform, but unified will always stand for the same principals we were founded on. That being the freedom to keep your profits made from your work, with minimal taxes taken. I believe in this method of operating so much, i have opted to donate my paycheque if elected.

  11. Posted

    26 minutes ago, Identity_Party_Data said:

    The reasoning behind making a discord for the purpose of the debate is to allow us to do certain things we can't do in the official discord, one of those making sure we can ensure order in the debate without everyone speaking at the same time. We also plan on recording the whole debate and transcribing it to the forums, so you have no worries there. We plan on talking to the devs and beach about possibly expanding the IPO into the official discord in the future, but for now we have to use what we have.

    The current official discord has both a typed podium and a voice chat podium that rarely has people in it. Im not moving my campaign to support unofficial sources. If anyone wants to debate anything, im am always on the official discord and i am always prepared to defend my platforms policies.

  12. Posted

    12 minutes ago, ColeBarron said:

    Thank you for the quick response. I have seen a couple of numbers thrown out such as 10% or 12% flat rates. In your opinion, would you say these are realistic expectations, or extreme guesstimates in order to gain votes?

    I am uncertain, but you can rest assured Unified will always stand by our policies. When we assure you low taxes we mean it. We dont just throw out numbers to obtain votes, we wait until we can confirm facts from developers before we solidify our policies.

  13. Posted

    7 minutes ago, ColeBarron said:

    Do you have a specific rate in mind? I know a few parties have showed interest in flat rate across the board. I'm just curious what that rate would be. 

    Because no developer has confirmed exactly what taxes are used for, we havent set a particular rate, HOWEVER, i will NOT be accepting a salary in order to reduce the cost of taxes. Instead, my personal pay as governor will be donated to pay things taxes are used to pay.

    • Like 1

  14. Posted

    I prefer to keep all information in the official discord. I dont want to take people away from there, nor do i want people to not have a typed record of evrrything i say that has to do with my campaign. There is nothing wrong with the official discord's podium section where thus sort of thing is supposed to go on at.

  19. Posted

    9 minutes ago, DLimit said:

    Capitalist logic: I've produced an idea that involves producing a shirt with a logo on it. Thus, I deserve the majority of the wealth that is generated by my employee's labour. You know, the black shirt with the symbol of a check-mark? I had invented the check-mark. Thus, the inventor of this idea deserves to profit from the labour of it's workers, even though the workers had produced 100% of these shirts.

    Communist/Socialist logic: The workers produced 100% of the goods and services. Thus, the goods and services must be distributed equally amongst the workers.

    Business owners have the long term goal of having their business run by other people while they collect the profits because it is THIER business. Their employees didn't put up the funding money, didn't start from the bottom. They were hired on and paid to do their job, they shouldn't just be given all the profits to someone elses business.

    • Like 2

  20. Posted

    49 minutes ago, DLimit said:

    The People's Revolutionary Party argues that the hard-working labour-class deserves to attain the basic necessities to life rather than providing C.E.O.s, whom do not produce a SINGLE good and service within the company, with an extraordinary amount of wealth for merely forming an idea.

    The P.R.P. does not argue that "unsuccessful people do not deserve wealth". The P.R.P. argues that the PRODUCERS deserve to seize the means of production and claim ownership, as a collective, of what is rightfully theirs... their production.

    The average C.E.O. will profit from the blood, sweat, tears, and labour of the working-class citizen while the average working-class citizen will struggle to survive within "The Unified Party"'s political system. Why should subjects that sit within an office and engage in business meetings profit from the labour of the average working-class citizen when the average working-class citizen produces 100% of the commodities and services within society? It is an exploited system that must be abolished.

    Workers of the world, unite under The People's Revolutionary Party!

    If it wasn't for those CEOs no one would have a job. We're not going to take from the entrepreneurs and give to people who won't do for themselves.

    • Like 1

  21. Posted

    5 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    Gender discrimination is a "lesser issue" for you? That sums up your entire campaign in a nutshell.

    I tried complimenting you and being friendly and you appear to be incredibly ungrateful for that and my suggestion to @NanoSpace to re-add you to the list. Instead, you take every opportunity to create conflict with me for no apparent reason.

     

    Please learn to mature a bit more if you wish to continue this discussion.

    Well it isn't my job to help you get elected, Mr. Hamilton. For the record, I don't think anyone here in this fine community has been discriminating against genders. We can see what you think of the fine citizens out there.

  23. Posted

    The important things in my policies are there, It disclaims we will not be concerning ourselves with lesser issues, like gender roles, religions, ect. They're distractions from real issues, like your 15% tax.

  24. Posted

    6 minutes ago, BrianHamilton said:

    HOWEVER, he is still lacking a proper list of policies and laws. He explained a lot of things very well, but he is still missing a list of policies which is a crucial part of a campaign.

    It's biased for someone in the campaign to demand what information i should have publicly available to be considered in a public poll. Of course any competition will not want me to be "allowed" to be on it. Certainly not when I was in second place in votes.

    • Like 1