DLimit
-
Content count
695 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Posts posted by DLimit
-
-
On 5/11/2017 at 9:46 PM, LuciousTimes said:Your view on marriage? Gay marriage? Beastiality? ETC?
Marriage shall remain identical to the current system, excluding the establishment of the idea of "ownership". Thus, the items that are shared between both individuals or partners within a "legal bond" does not consist of "private property" considering that "private property" shall be replaced with "personal items". It merely involves the elimination of the capitalist idea of "ownership".
Homosexuality, alongside forming homosexual relationships and legal bonds, shall be a legal and acceptable act that is supported by The People's Revolutionary Party considering that it is one's Right to Life and Liberty.
It shall be illegal for human beings to engage in sexual relations or a legal bond with an animal considering that the animal is incapable of voluntarily consenting to such agreements via a verbal or written contract.
It shall be illegal for adults to engage in sexual relations or a legal bond with children considering that a child's mind is not well-developed to form to voluntary decision to engage in either sexual relations or a legal bond with an adult through a verbal or written contract. However, it shall be legal for a sixteen year-old to consent to sexual relations with another individual that is in-between the ages of sixteen and seventeen. -
10 minutes ago, uncannierlink said:So "The Party" controls the head of state? What are the requirements for being a member of the party?
Also, just because he isn't supposed to veto proposals that are constitutional, doesn't mean he can't. Unless that gets him thrown out of office, but then any vetoed proposal the party doesn't like will get him thrown out of office.
ALSO, you keep saying "constitutional" as if your constitution is perfectly objective. It's not. It can't be. Language is inherently subjective as the meaning of words changes not only over time but from person to person. My question to you is; who determines what is constitutional and what is not and how are they put into that position of power?
P.S. you don't have to reinvent the wheel here, America's had the longest standing democracy on the planet. There's been a peaceful transition of power for 250 years for a reason.
Not at all, the People determine the actions of the head of state as long as the acts are deemed to be Constitutional. The Constitutional guidelines shall be emphasized much more effectively during the campaign in order for individuals to understand the context of the Constitution. In the process, The Constitution shall be manifested by The People's Revolutionary Party based on ideals that are similar to Marxist-Leninism.
Representatives are presented to the public as candidates during the election through democratic means. -
5 hours ago, uncannierlink said:Ah. So the party representative can veto anything he doesn't approve of. Why didn't you say that in the first place?
Is the party representative chosen by popular vote? Because it's kinda the same problem if he is. Also, there are other ways to violate people's rights than through violence. Look at Jim Crow America. Those people believed everything was perfectly in line.
The party representative cannot veto any proposals that are CONSTITUTIONAL.
The People elect the representative by voting for The People's Revolutionary Party. However, The People's Revolutionary Party shall be expected to replace the representative that commits an act of "Misrepresentation" with a different member that is capable of representing the interests of the people. -
8 hours ago, uncannierlink said:No, it's not. The law enforcement officers are enforcing the laws created by the majority. The question has no answer, because in your system if the majority wills it, it will be.
The majority cannot enact a Law that is Unconstitutional. Thus, the representative of the party is capable of rejecting the proposal of the majority as long as it is unconstitutional.. Thus, Law enforcement officers would be obligated to incarcerate or execute individuals that intend to utilize violence as a means towards enforcing the unconstitutional Law based on the sole premise that the individuals would be committing acts of treason, high treason, and terrorism.
-
3 hours ago, uncannierlink said:You're constitution is not all encompassing. You're adding things as present hypothetical scenarios. Who stops the majority from violating the constitution? What if the minority believes the majority is violating their rights but the majority believes they aren't? Who decides? The majority.....
It is identical to stating "Who stops the majority from committing homicide?"... Law enforcement officers.
-
4 minutes ago, Hanshi-Toshiro said:Hmm.
Well we do dabble in illegal racing. Buy ins of over 500 dollars sometimes. So yes, I will make a slow and steady income with my club. Even if I decide no to be a radio show host (which is my current occupation I forgot to say, street racing is on the side) and open a brokerage firm, and do some "illegal" things. I will definitely locate you and your party and use a defendant if I make it to a court of law.
May you please e-mail my account within my profile in order to maintain relations with one another during the game's release?
-
1
-
-
How about possessing the ability to alter the exterior of the household identical to the interior of the household by changing it's color, trimmings, and style? I.E. An option to produce a red household with wood or a brown household with bricks combined with Victorian-styled designs.
-
7 minutes ago, Hanshi-Toshiro said:Believe it or not, I am a street racer. Selling and buying legal and illegal parts for street racers, drifters and such.
I was interested in opening up a brokerage firm, still am.
Would one desire functioning as an illegal street racer for the organization in order to increase your profits AND attain benefits from the organization? For example, a lawyer of "The Left-Hand Mafia" or it's political party shall be capable of defending your character against prosecutors within a court of Law for FREE.
-
5 minutes ago, Hanshi-Toshiro said:Again, sorry for the long response. I work long hours on the weekend.
I both agree with these responses. Well said. In my honest opinion I think both of you know what the fuck you are talking about.
I truly think I have said to much and have been beaten by the true extent of your superior dialect in this pleasant conversation.
Carry on forth with your organization, I wish you the best of luck.
It was a pleasure to discuss such a topic with you. I am curious, what shall be your role within the game?
-
1
-
-
Harassment is a form of discrimination. It involves any unwanted physical or verbal behaviour that offends or humiliates you. Generally, harassment is a behaviour that persists over time. Serious one-time incidents can also sometimes be considered harassment.
Harassment occurs when someone:
- makes unwelcome remarks or jokes about your race, religion, sex, age, disability or any other of the 11 grounds of discrimination.
- threatens or intimidates you.
- makes unwelcome physical contact with you, such as touching, patting, pinching or punching, which can also be considered assault.
-
27 minutes ago, uncannierlink said:How much privacy? Do certain people get more privacy than others? What about the right to not be verbally abused? What if the majority classifies a dirty rag as clothing for the minority? I could go on forever. The point is, the majority has too much power.
Also, if the people who enforce the laws answer to the majority than what difference does it make if the constitution says one thing or another. When you give all the power to the majority, there is nothing to balance them out.
How much privacy? Each and every human being possesses the Right to privacy as long as subjects do not infringe the criminal Laws of the state. In other terms, government agents are expected to attain probable cause or a warrant from a judge, in order to infringe one's Right to privacy.
The majority cannot enact such Laws against the minority considering that it infringes their Right to Liberty. In fact, one cannot enact any policies that causes one group to be supposedly inferior or superior to another group, excluding certain government-based jobs that involves attaining certain privileges. For example, a Law enforcement officer shall possess the privilege to search and seize a criminal's items during an arrest.
Verbal abuse shall be measured within the judicial system depending on whether the verbal abuse is an act of harassment. An individual possesses the Right to state "F*ck you" as long as it is not a repetitive act that offends an individual or party. However, an individual that possesses a permit to protest within the street possesses every Right to express their ideals within their physical boundaries without being charged for harassment considering that the "victim" could easily depart from the location.
You are listing unconstitutional scenarios. The Constitution mentions that the representative could reject any proposition by the People as long as the proposition is unconstitutional. -
49 minutes ago, Bubbles said:I agree that serial killers have no place in an RP environment, but I don't mind a psychopath or two as long as people do their research and don't use it as an excuse to RDM people.
You make a very fair point about kidnappings, I love being a hostage as long as people are interested in RP and not only money and shootouts
Unfortunately I'm already pretty sure I'll have to deal with some of those people that are "crazy" with no background and/or no insight into mental illnesses.
I'll also be sure to stick to private whitelisted servers when the time comes so I can enjoy this game
Serial killers are expected to strategically analyze their reason for committing homicidal acts. For example, certain serial killers merely target females with blonde hair and blue eyes within parks, resulting in providing the police department with the ability to "profile" the suspect, identical to Criminal Minds.
Other serial killers prefer to abduct "Pop stars" in order to execute their victims through a sulfuric bath.
Certain serial killers merely commit serial killings on "March 13ths" and "April 21rsts"... it requires an extensive amount of roleplay between the serial killer and Law enforcement officers that are examining the case.
Patterns... -
7 minutes ago, uncannierlink said:Yes, but who defines what Life Liberty and Personal Space means? The majority. While maybe they couldn't kill them, they could certainly disenfranchise them in other areas.
Any acts of discrimination is intolerable as long as the city/state is governed by The People's Revolutionary Party. However, groups shall be prosecuted if their acts include promoting hate-speech towards another group considering that it may incite violence against a group based on their ideals. For example, a Neo-Nazi cannot express his hatred towards the Negro population considering that it may provoke radical individuals to commit acts of violence against an individual based on the colour of their skin.
Disagreement is separate from hate-speech.
Unconstitutional.
P.S. The majority cannot infringe the Constitutional guidelines of the party.Simplified:
"Life" = Right to exist
"Liberty" = Right to BE
"Personal Space" = Right to privacy, household, food, clothing, shelter, energy, and other possessions that are not PRIVATELY owned, but PERSONALLY owned by the individual. -
On 5/6/2017 at 8:06 PM, uncannierlink said:3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.
Not to mention the economy will collapse as no one will want to work, as money is useless.
P.S. Individuals will not attain such benefits from the state unless they are laborers within the state, excluding individuals that are either too physically or mentally disabled to fulfill a single role within the system. Either way, a physically disabled person would possess a job that does not involve physical labour while a mentally disabled individual shall fulfill a role that is functional and desirable for their precious minds.
-
On 5/6/2017 at 9:57 PM, ThomasHetch said:that is four words sorry OCD but I would like to say to this party that these are basic rights of citizens what is your tax plan and are you running fro governor
Within a planned economy, resources shall be re-allocated according to one's needs.
It shall depend on the circumstances at the time considering that 100% taxation shall be necessary during an economic crisis that involves government intervention.
Funding? The people shall produce commodities and services that shall be distributed to the public. Simple as it sounds, it is effective when each and every human being fulfills the role that they desire within society. -
On 5/6/2017 at 8:06 PM, uncannierlink said:3 words my friend: Tyranny of the Majority. What if the majority decides to Lynche members of the other half because they are criminals when they are actually innocent? What if the majority decides to subjugate minorities in order to better their own lives? By your government, the Majority has tyranny.
Not to mention the economy will collapse as no one will want to work, as money is useless.
Each and every citizen deserves the Right to Life, Liberty, and Personal Space. Thus, any act that infringes the Constitution, including lynching the majority without probable cause, is a criminal offense to the party. In the process, lynchings will be prohibited considering that the death penalty is not a necessary or ethical method towards reinforcing positive behaviors and removing negative behaviors within society.
-
The People's Revolutionary Party does not intend to commit any acts of corruption considering that, according to the P.R.P.'s Constitution, the mere act of "Misrepresentation" shall automatically result in a removal of the representative within office through peaceful OR violent means.
-
Any questions regarding the organization?
-
22 minutes ago, The1TheOnlyGonzo said:With Capitalism only those with impact on the market truly have the opportunity to peruse happiness and will most likely attain it.
Capitalism is only a system to create a Consumer mass public with a Supplier upper class. This makes a Consumer class a mandatory need for the economy, forcing the mass population under a dollar value, dependant on an inflating market.
Thus you get Bubble Economies that pop when they inflate to an unstable point, and forces a depression and/or a recession on the market. Examples of this is the Automotive Bubble, and the upcoming Mortgage Bubble that is reported to be popping anytime. These Bubbles were made through grey market moves and exploitation of the Capitalist Market.
Millionaires can happen within Communism, however this would become more a reality for a Communist (True Communist) when the economy became self sustaining and stable. The true reality with Communism is to break the concept of need class within a society, not to force a blanket pay amount to everyone. A doctor in Communism will still be respected and paid for his work, he is just no better than a labourer, each are vital in their own field. The "Democratic" governments of North America have just done the most they can to taint the ideal of Communism, and the "Communist" Governments of today aren't actually Communism, bit actually Dictatorships or Totalitarian Governments hiding behind the tainted concept of Communism.
Since the 1960s, the expanding income-inequality gap between the upper-quintiles (rich) and lower quintiles (poor) have increased dramatically considering that the capitalist system has resulted in the formation of an oligopoly, which is classified as the "late-stages of capitalism" or "imperialism" By Vladimir Lenin. In the process, enacting neo-liberal policies that abolish any form of government interference with wages or tariffs has resulted in multi-national corporations, such as Nestle, to claim ownership of freshwater rivers within India. Due to Nestle's mass-production of water within India, local farmers struggle with the ability to harvest any crops. Thus, the Indian farmers are expected to attain a loan from a bank in order to purchase water bottles and coca-cola from Nestle in order to harvest and sell crops within their region. However, the profits that are accumulated from harvesting and distributing these crops are usually spent on paying off their debts to the banks. Thus, farmers labor extensively within a cycle of paying off debts rather than progressing through the financial ladder of capitalism.
It is a broken system that must be resolved through Socialism.
P.S. First-world nations or developed nations prosper due to sweatshop labour overseas. Otherwise, commodities would be overpriced to the extent that the average working-class citizen within North-America or Western Europe would struggle with the ability to afford the product considering that companies are expected to maximize their profits.-
1
-
-
30 minutes ago, Hanshi-Toshiro said:okay sorry for the long response. I was too tired to process your response.
I had a conversation like this with a good freind were he regarded the fact that men and women that lived in poverty had an equal chance no matter what. Like you stated in your reply. My problem with that though is why give every single person a chance if their are people who who don't need a chance. Hence a person who is or has the capability to be a multi-millionaire. In which my further statement is that communism will work better when the greater majority of the people are struggling. That's why with capitalism everybody has the chance to make it big. You have to be smart. When you have a country were everybody makes the same exact amount of money, men and women with potential to possibly make millions of dollars, do not have to opportunity. This leads to a downward butterfly effect spiral.
Each and every single individual does not possess the opportunity to be wealthy due to the inequality of wealth that exists within the planet Earth. In reality, one out of a few hundred million are capable of functioning as a FAIRLY wealthy individual through the exploitation of the remainder of the inhabitants on the planet.
Communism provides each and every single human being with Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education in order for each and every single human being to fulfill their own internal desires within life without being forced to labour identical to a slave for the purposes of funding tuition fees etc.-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Hanshi-Toshiro said:Could agree.
Yet the pictures I posted are educational for younger audiences. Hence why it's so easy to figure out.
Younger audiences are capable of distinguishing the difference between a 2-dimensional image and a 3-dimensional image considering that geometry is taught within elementary/primary educational institutions throughout North America and Western Europe. Your image appears to be extremely misleading considering that "Freedom" would indicate that a failed state that is undergoing a state of Anarchy, such as Somaaliyaa, is more liberating than the pure Marxist-Leninist ideals that provides individuals with universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education.
P.S. The DPRK, Venezuela, modern-day Russia or Stalinist Russia, Hitler-controlled NAZI Germany, Angola, The People's Republic of China, or modern-day Cuba are NOT representations of either of the ideals of Karl Marx or Wladimir Lenin. -
8 minutes ago, Norway174 said:"Hmm...
Funny to see you here, Mr. @DLimit.
Are you sure you don't know about the Left Hand Mafia?Just a coincidence you're in the neighborhood?"
The forum account would remain separate from the characters. Thus, the agent would be incapable of associating the character, organization, and political party with one another within the game.
-
On 4/22/2017 at 2:37 AM, Hanshi-Toshiro said:Sir, I cannot agree with you. I believe in far right politics but I do not see myself as a fascist.
See I believe in nationalism and republicanism. One should be able to die for their country to sacrifice the billions of others. It's just like my uncle told me who was a Vietnam veteran. It's better to lay yourself down for the sake of 7 other men, or your whole battalion. Republicanism in the fact the people should decide what happens in their country. What we see today in modern U.S.A are groups like Anti-Fascist groups around our campuses, who claim to be "getting rid of fascists" yet go around beating people up.
The terms have changed. People are to dumb these days.
Heres another diagram I got from the same website.
The entire post does not seem relevant to the criminal organization.
P.S. the "left-right" doctrine is inaccurate considering that political ideologies are truthfully measured in a political COMPASS:
-
On 4/23/2017 at 8:53 AM, Norway174 said:"Mr. @DLimit,
Thank you for taking this time to sit down and talk with me.
You don't know me yet, I am Special Agent Zoey Anderson.I'm here on official FBI business, I'm afraid. Not here to talk politics.
Your views are of no concern to me.However, what is a concern to me, is the allegations that ties you to an
organization that calls themselves The "Left Hand Mafia". Apparently,
putting you as their leader.How do you respond to these allegations?"
(( I do wish you the best of luck on your campaign, I'm just here in-character. And no offense is meant.
You don't have respond in-character if you don't wish to partake in the RP.
))
The allegations that are produced by Special Agent Zoey Anderson are one-hundred percent false without any evidence to support such a claim. In the process, I am not familiar with such an organization.
The People's Revolutionary Party (P.R.P.) [HIRING!]
in The Podium
Posted
In reality, it often depends on the circumstances.
The objective of the party involves ensuring that the citizens fulfill roles that they desire for non-materialistic purposes. Thus, an individual should function as a doctor for the sole purpose of functioning as a doctor rather than functioning as a doctor in order to accumulate an extensive amount of wealth. Thus, the party would expect individuals to be paid the identical wage in order to ensure that one's labour is "internalized" rather than "externalized".
http://aluceromontano.tripod.com/id11.html
However, as long as each and every human being is capable of attaining Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education, wages could be divided according to one's internalized labour. Thus, a doctor may earn more than a garbage man/woman as long as each and every human being attains Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education.
During periods of overproduction, taxation shall be decreased to a simple "income-tax" that involves increasing taxation to individuals with a higher income and decreasing taxation to individuals with a lower-income based on a "five-quintile" class structure.
1. Upper Class
2. Upper-Middle Class
3. Middle Class
4. Lower-Middle Class
5. Lower Class
Overproduction results in enacting an "INCOME-TAX" considering that each and every human being shall attain an EXCESS of Universal food, clothing, shelter, energy, healthcare, and education. For example, the production of 100,000 cans/bags of coffee shall provide each citizen with 100 cans/bags of coffee, indicating that a commodity is in EXCESS to the public.
However, during a time period of underproduction and underconsumption, the "Income-Tax" shall be abolished in exchange for a "100% Universal Tax" in order for the party to distribute resources a bit more effectively, according to the NEEDS of the people.