RuneScape

Members
  • Content count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RuneScape


  1. On 9/1/2018 at 6:22 PM, Cstove said:

    They are no where near identity in development progress.  Their game rn is just a bunch of UE4 assets.  They’re also no where near on track to get their funding.

     

    What the game Nine to Five RPG has accomplished in 2 months means they are well on track to surpassing identity... Imagine how fast things will speed up if they manage to receive their goal on kickstarter. 

    Everyone received an email off Identity about a month ago stating how we're all going to receive multiple emails every month now...  Did we?? No... Why? Because it was just a quick attempt to gain a bunch of extra cash from potential new customers. They hyped up some mafia territory thing and some new pets to peak peoples interest again. We will probably receive a similar email in a few months time with some convenient new cash shop items... again promising lots of emails every month only to go dead after that single one. Wonder what the next news thing will be.... "Introducing planes to travel around the world... Buy your plane now for a limited time before it's gone forever" 

     

    • Like 1

  2. 4 minutes ago, GrumpyReg6657 said:

    What do you mean, Town Square?? 

     

    Town square will probably be released sometime next year. But the town square itself is unlikely to offer much entertainment. It would be more about walking around and not doing much other than socializing with other people.  People will get bored of that very fast.  And it's took them this many year just to sort that out. 

    • Like 1

  3. 22 minutes ago, dagtag said:

    I don't know if you realize, but this is a ROLEPLAY game, if you are bothered by trolls then don't play on public servers but rather on private ones. if you limit the amount of things you can do then whats the point in having a roleplay game. what they can do is that you have the option while using a board to turn chess on/off so you still have a choice in what you want to play, but the element of choice needs to be in the game nonetheless.

    and you don't know the statistics, this game will attract other roleplayers at first, meaning no trolls.

    Okay so in this roleplay game why doesn't someone else come up and steal the chess game alltogether / the pieces? Again... You're still trying to defend something that cannot be defended... Your defence again would be "now you're just being silly" Which is the exact same with your statement.. 

    This game will mostly be full of players wanting a GTA / mafia style game not the average role playing ARMA server. 

     

    • Like 1

  4. On 9/2/2018 at 10:13 AM, thiesen90 said:

    So if the numbers of Citizen is the number of account, on this page, that sounds more like a sale strategy to get even more money.. so people think wow alot of players bought this, i Will do the same.. so in my eyes a little lie to atract more people.. 

     

    That is exactly the reasoning behind it. 

    • ver.1.22474487139 1

  5. On 8/30/2018 at 2:42 PM, dagtag said:

    That's completely different, god you are arguing for the sake of arguing. It is realistic to give people the ability to move chess pieces wherever you want because you can do that in real life, as I said you can make up your own rules. guns however is a whole different thing...its not realistic to get your gun permanently jammed... a gun works in a certain way unless you modify it irl, a game works in a certain way because of its rules, game rules can easily be changed by players, how that gun works is not your choice... giving someone the ability to choose is definitely not the same as making a gun "permanently jammed". 

     

    And you're defending for the sake of defending... on every single post....

    Some things shouldn't be defended and when you start defending them you just lose all credability in anything you actually defended well. 

    If the chess board is left in its current form the game (chess) will be played by 90% trolls and 10% people who actually want to play chess.  This will be changed I'm sure.... so don't try and defend something that shouldn't be defended. 

    On 8/30/2018 at 6:24 PM, raicyrose said:

    You can't really compare a game with chess pieces to a gun, as in real life, plenty of board games have alternate rules made up by players, while a gun, is a gun, no matter what. The only thing you can change in the gun would be Russian roulette shooting, apart from that, not too customizable, unlike a board game like chess. 

    As we're using chess as an example: you can change the number of pieces, their position, their roles, the rules itself. So limiting chess to one set of rules is quite limiting, especially when in reality this is only the case in certain competitions. Hope this bit of info helped! =)

     

    If they want to add in more board games that's cool but as I just mentioned, those that actually want to play chess will have a hard time finding other legit players. They will just be tossing pieces around for fun. 


  6. On 8/28/2018 at 4:54 PM, dagtag said:

    its how they planned it tho, and I kinda like the concept. like this you can play the game using your own rules, it gives the player a choice. if you go ahead and make the game bound to certain rules you take away the players ability to choose, if that makes sense

     

    Lmao your defending is just getting more ridiculous. I'm pretty sure they will make chess work properly by the time (if ever) the town square opens. 

    But seriously stop with this ludicrous defending.. making an excuse for EVERY SINGLE THING... I mean what you just said takes it to a whole new level lmao. It's like saying "this gun isn't working in the PVP area because they don't want the gun to abide by the rules... in real life guns jam and so they intended all guns to permanently be jammed" 

    OR you could be realistic and say "hey the guns in the game are bugged and won't fire" You see how being realistic is better? Good ... lesson learned.

    It's like you're fishing to become a forum mod. In fact yeah that must be it.  

    • Like 1

  7. On 8/15/2018 at 12:13 PM, dagtag said:

    Kickstarter only allows a year for the development time so this was not an expected release date. Since the kickstarter started in 2015 they couldnt go higher than 2016.

     

    I keep seeing this being used as a defence but did the developers clearly state this in the kickstarter description? If they did not then they took money for this investment knowing that the investors were essentially being scammed.

    For example... 

    If I go to buy a vehicle and the owner tells me I should receive the vehicle at the end of the month then I know to expect a potential delay of maybe a week or so which is fine. If that 1 month turned into 2 years I would say I've been scammed even if I eventually got my vehicle. Now... if this owner said to me beforehand "look you will get your vehicle in about 2 years time but I'm only allowed to show a listing delay of 30 days so don't expect it beforehand" Then that is completely fine I knew what to expect. 

    What I'm saying is... if they did not explain the situation during the kickstarter progress KNOWING that the project would take much longer than the maximum time they were allowed to put then what they did was in essence scam people into giving them money which had they known the actual deadline most probably would not have invested / donated.  (I'm sure the investment would have come from other people eventually) 

    I love this game I can't wait to play it but you constantly defending something that shouldn't be defended is not helping the situation and doesn't calm people down.  

    • Like 2

  8. Nope the dogs won't shit everywhere because you may never get a chance to see them. 

    like the devs I'm also selling this -googles a random picture-  It's ermmmm $5000 very fast. 

    20-Interesting-Facts-about-Ferrari.jpg