ApertureScience

Members
  • Content count

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ApertureScience


  1. On 21/4/2016 at 3:12 AM, JamesLuck01 said:

    Hell No. If you want the movement like GTA V then get outa here, GTA V with the car steering is more arcade like and it makes the game worse in my opinion. On the other hand GTA IV car movement is great.

    No not wrong, they stated beta release would be late 2016 early 2017 so if anything he is just being closed with his answer. There was no accurate month given.

    Also you can edit your post so please dont double post as there is no need for it.

    Why should he get out of here? He just want GTA 5 movement, no need to be agressive. GTA 4 movement are awful, the vehicle controls like a boat, it isn't like that irl. It shouldnt be as fast and be too hard to steer because of this.

     

    What is my concerns in this game? Everything. Really, everything. The developers want to make everything too complex. They want a very big vehicle customization, player customization, appartment customization, housing, radio, cinema, they want to make everything deep. This is VERY ambitious and i don't think they could do that. Or else, GTA 5 could have been even better because it had 250$M of budget.. I hope they got their priority right for the game atm..


  2. On 12/4/2016 at 3:27 AM, Xavier said:

    Yeah I agree with you on that. But let's keep in mind guys(and girls), there are only about 33 devs working o this game, and only like 2 of them(maybe) are trying to tweet and respond to us. It's pretty tough. Only if they had like 100 more devs, that would be great. Most like BIG OVERRATED games like Fallout 4 probably had like 500 devs, or maybe more contributing to it.

     

    On 12/4/2016 at 7:01 PM, LionKingGamer said:

    That is very true Five Nights at Freddys was and is an AAA Game and there is one dev for it so its possible for an AAA with small team

    Too easy. The bethesda's team for Fallout 4 is about 100 people, bethesda is VERY small compared to the huge CDPROJEKTRED with more than 300 employee around the globe which worked on witcher 3 (fallout 4 team was pretty much developed in one place, not like there were outside workers in their team). Ubisoft montreal has 2800 employee around the world and that's why they can permit themselve to make one AC per year.

     

    Five Night At Freddy is not an AAA games by anyway, it is an indie game made by a guy who nobody knew or acknowledged in the past which was developed on a "easy engine" : The engine which was developed Five Night At Freddy cannot support 3D graphic, everything you see in game are gif, the jumpscare, the minigame, everything. He only had to make those gif and some programming, that's why he could make 4 fnaf in one year.


  3. On 9/4/2016 at 3:04 AM, Miki_Chee said:

     

     

    You complain about the The 'shitty pink shotgun' in GTA Yet you have a PIcture of GTA as your profile pic..

    you complain about these clothing not being immersive? Where the heck do you live? i see these clothes every day and enjoy seeing it, its something different in amongst all the grey black and white suits.

    Not everyone wants a plain white t-shirt with a pair of jeans, its just stupid. It is a game, and immersion should be about seeing someone wearing something abnormal and being like 'well thats not immersive' What makes a game immersive is the community, and how you as a person intaract as a whole. 

    i know identity isnt set in japan. But you can get these clothes anywhere. 

    It should be aloud to be a thing just as much as The swaggot look!.

    And besides no doubt you are a male ofcorse you dont need to wear it. if anything it just gives you a big flashy colorful target to kill. OOoh waaait its not GTA you wont be able to just kill anyone anywhere? right. 

    SO please takeyoue closed minded 12 year old mind and go back to GTA because clearly the maturity of life is to much for you to handle.

     

    I never said i disliked GTA, and second, it's a pic from Vice City.

    "Muh 12 year old GTA go back to GTA!! not with my opinion? well go back to your gta and c4ll of d00ty"

    No. Well you must be asian then because such cloth is not very present on my country (france) cause those are ridiculous. Also the game aim a exotic contemporary design so yep..


  4. 2 minutes ago, Herzog said:

    I think they will. There's no need to get butt hurt over a fashion style. It's in the game but you don't have to wear it do you. You play the game how you want but you don't play the game for someone else 

    It's a question of being immersed in the game's universe, this is why i dislike those idea.


  5. 1 minute ago, Herzog said:

    The game may not be set in Japan but it is a style that people want. Everyone wants different things to show who they really are 

    i don't want to be playing a game where everything is flashy and colored. it would be like GTA 5 with those shitty pink shotgun and ridiculous girl-slut..


  6. On 28/3/2016 at 10:08 PM, David said:

    Do you not understand? This has nothing to do with economy or player equality; this has to do with roleplay experiences within the game. Even if helicopters were 1 million dollars, inevitably, players would achieve this and the scenario which PARATUS describes would happen; and the more people you take out of these interactions, the more dead the world would begin to feel.

    tl;dr - no

    Well in MY roleplay experience i don't give a fuck about a car collisions and i wish to drive helicopter to avoid that kinds of thing. It's up to the player choice. My character drives helicopter for criminal, can't he?


  7. 1 hour ago, Herzog said:

    I started gaming at a very young age. The only online game i played was BF2 on shitty Dell desktop. I think the reason people get bad experiences from younger players is due to the fact that they see a new game come out, its got guns and they immediately think... Call of Duty.

    A lot of the time, younger people on life games are the people that just go around shooting everyone for no reason. As long as the younger person has experience in life games and uses RP well, then there is nothing wrong with that. But the people that just buy the game because they feel like shooting up a bank are the people you have to watch out for.

    But i can be very wrong too. I have, like many of you, had a big experience and videogame and with people IRL, i am a bit disappointed by that new 2000 generatio that seems too pretentious/greedy and absolutely being bad child in general (having their parents buy everything they want make them very butthurt if someone they to them "no"), i don't like kids ruining my videogame and effectively, most of it come from BF/COD but they are actually on some more serious game if you really have bad luck.


  8. You are not different from the other child, you still got a squeaky voice, yeah just because you are young you are supposed to not play the game, your comparison don't work exactly because a 70 years old is more mature than a little child. It's not because you say you are mature that you do. The ones that are truly mature don't feel the need to say it, are you feeling concerned by the fact you are not mature?

    Don't try youngsters, shut up and learn from the big guy and come back when you got a better behavior.  That's name also isn't serious. No, you can't play or roleplay perfectly, you are too young to give the other people PLEASURE to roleplay with you and to yourself give pleasure because people won't take you seriously.

    • Like 1