yellowhero12

Members
  • Content count

    227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by yellowhero12


  1. On 9/3/2017 at 11:49 AM, AdamAshford said:

    Gun Ownership:

    I strongly believe in and support liberty and freedom. With it comes liberty to be free. Free from oppression and injustice. Having the means and freedom of protecting yourself, your loved once and any other members of society that requires your immediate assistance is a necessary and basic freedom in my eyes. Therefore, I stand strongly and passionately with the rightful owners of the firearms.

    However, I see a lot of bloodshed nowadays that could have been avoided if some necessary steps have been taken to insure safety of the people without the need of taking away their most basic liberties and freedoms.

    If we as a modern society cannot agree on basic steps insuring safe gun ownership then we will continue to see even more and more brutal bloodshed. And it will be all on us!

    Thank you for your questions!

    You never actually state your policy on gun ownership, you just ramble about the pros and cons of it.

     

    10 minutes ago, AdamAshford said:

    It is fascinating to feel your open hatred for the government and its serving personnel, I enjoy a healthy capitalism and I agree a lot on your points of view, but this hatred will be the end of you! Having it - you loose the perspective on things that are real... becoming a capitalist fanatic makes you weak not strong! I support capitalism and all that comes with it... but you amaze me with such radical ways of approaching things!

    You would do quite bad in the real political arena if you would take this way of doing things in the real world. I understand that this is a game, but we are discussing topics far greater than it is necessary for the gameplay, therefore I say this to you!

    He doesn't hate the government or it's personnel as far I can tell. It seems like he is attempting to engage in a dialogue(which you state that you support) and your response is accusations that he hates the government and is a poor candidate. 

    I believe his point was that it isn't the governments job to provide universal healthcare. In many countries they already partially subsidize healthcare, and in some cases it leads to inflated prices and a lack of affordable options. 

    You should really attempt to continue a dialogue with someone before you start calling them a fanatic and accuse them of hating their government.

    • Like 1

  2. They do hire freelancers, but I don't know how much third party monetization there will be. They have already stated there will be some cosmetic micro transactions, but it was implied that it would be sold by the development team. 


  3. So first of all, why do Emergency Services get paid more than any other profession? Obviously they are crucial to society, but there are some jobs that pay higher than for Emergency Services for a reason. The Laws section is missing any info on your policy on Drugs, what's legal, what's not, what are the punishments? 

    Would you force Churches/Temples/Mosques to marry a gay/lesbian couple even if they believed it was against their religion?


  4. I wouldn't know how the jury would know that the lawyer is in house, but it still doesn't make sense. How is an in-house lawyer seen as corrupt? Lawyers are legally obligated to defend their client, regardless of if their client personally confesses to the Lawyer. An in-house lawyer just means that instead of a firm he solely works for the company, I see no corruption there.


  5. 5 minutes ago, Saavedro said:

    Perhaps conflict of interest with the jury, an in-house lawyer could be seen as easily influenced (in one way or another) as he's apart of the company/organization. Though obviously the jury should only consider the evidence as is the case in RL situations (companies have in-house lawyers all the time). But personally, I hope to represent a number of individual civilians along with companies/organization.  

    Again, it's so difficult to really tell how any of this will work until we get more info from the devs. I'm still waiting just to see if US Federal laws apply ^_^

    ?? How is an in-house lawyer seen as easily influenced? A lawyer defends you whether or not they know you are guilty.


  6. 19 minutes ago, MichaelPayne said:

    I think sole representation by an in house legal team/aid is bad, it just has conflict of interest all over it.

    I think it will be better to have outside representation to create a barrier.

    ??? I don't understand the logic here. A lawyer wants to win the case either way, this isn't conflict of interest.