LuciousTimes

Mr. Lucious Times For Governor ( The Royal Family Party )

Recommended Posts

To the other candidates, I think now may finally be the time to present actual plans for Identity. I know your party platform give ideas, but they don't tell what you'll actually do within the parameters of what we can do. I'm really interested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's your stance on privatised security, in other words,

Do you believe it's okay for people to sell armed protection?

 

whats your opinion on censorship of information?

e.g. withholding information about crime or police actions?

 

could you go more in depth regarding your opinon on gun control?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Trisword said:

What's your stance on privatised security, in other words,

Do you believe it's okay for people to sell armed protection?

 

whats your opinion on censorship of information?

e.g. withholding information about crime or police actions?

 

could you go more in depth regarding your opinon on gun control?

Even though as Governor I  wouldn't  have control over these aspects in game would you still be interested in my stance?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, LuciousTimes said:

Even though as Governor I  wouldn't  have control over these aspects in game would you still be interested in my stance?

absolutley, i feel like any question whether do do with their capabilities or not is crutial to know what type of person were electing.

 

also I may be wrong but im fairly certain you will have some control over aspects such as making sure news regarding situations good or bad are held from the public. along with the private security being legal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Trisword said:

absolutley, i feel like any question whether do do with their capabilities or not is crutial to know what type of person were electing.

 

also I may be wrong but im fairly certain you will have some control over aspects such as making sure news regarding situations good or bad are held from the public. along with the private security being legal.

To answer your question...

 

Yes, as long as it is licensed and legal.

 

Morally you should never withhold information, but if someone isn't a suspect they shouldn't be held in contempt for not giving information. If they are a suspect, then yes they should be held to answering questions.

 

As far as guns go, I feel there are guns that are to be considered too dangerous. However, if you are licensed you should be able to own a gun. As far as carrying it around, I'm not too keen on that.

Edited by LuciousTimes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, LuciousTimes said:

To answer your question...

 

Yes, as long as it is licensed and legal.

 

Morally you should never withhold information, but if someone isn't a suspect they shouldn't be held in contempt for not giving information. If they are a suspect, then yes they should be held to answering questions.

 

As far as guns go, I feel there are guns that are to be considered too dangerous. However, if you are licensed you should be able to own a gun. As far as carrying it around, I'm not too keen on that.

I see...

Licensed security firms. Sounds good to me... ill contact you about that if you win the election.

I like your Innocent until proven guilty stance but what i meant is something controversial e.g. a police officer shooting an innocent or perhaps a terror act. would you hold information that could possibly incriminate you or any official that could lead to riots but take away the right to information or would you open all information to the public, allowing us to keep our rights to know but possibly risking copycats or tip off's (a hard choice im sure, I wanted to make a situation where you would have to pick a lesser of two evils depending on how you see it)

 

As with you ideals on gun ownership, I actually agree tenfold, Im quite happy for people to own weapons, its a right to access anything available. however i also agree that weapons should be treated as tools to cause harm/destruction, if your planning to carry a weapon out in public, conceal it in a car boot and only take it our either on a site permitted or on your own private land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Trisword said:

I see...

Licensed security firms. Sounds good to me... ill contact you about that if you win the election.

I like your Innocent until proven guilty stance but what i meant is something controversial e.g. a police officer shooting an innocent or perhaps a terror act. would you hold information that could possibly incriminate you or any official that could lead to riots but take away the right to information or would you open all information to the public, allowing us to keep our rights to know but possibly risking copycats or tip off's (a hard choice im sure, I wanted to make a situation where you would have to pick a lesser of two evils depending on how you see it)

 

As with you ideals on gun ownership, I actually agree tenfold, Im quite happy for people to own weapons, its a right to access anything available. however i also agree that weapons should be treated as tools to cause harm/destruction, if your planning to carry a weapon out in public, conceal it in a car boot and only take it our either on a site permitted or on your own private land.

The public should be aware of what's going on, we should never hide things from people. In certain situations I do feel there are things that don't need to be shared, but for the most part people should be informed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been silent regarding this information due to inside opinions on the releasing of it, however, I feel now is the time.

As stated in the original post, excluding myself, there will be 4 other Government Officials. 3 of them have been chosen. @JoelKeys will act as the Lieutenant Governor, @NexusGaming will act as the Business Counsel, and @Andrew811 will act as the Criminology Counsel. I’m proud to have them all at my side. The remaining position is the Security Counsel, that position is still needing to be filled.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@LuciousTimes I didn't say that. ¬¬ I said the unit itself is stupid. It's like using a foot as a unit of measurement. Or displaying the month before the day.

Get with the times guys... :P 
From Wikipedia

Edited by Norway174
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now